DOC

Justification of c-Fos as a marker of Neuronal Activity

By Amber Ferguson,2014-03-13 01:35
8 views 0
Justification of c-Fos as a Marker of Neuronal Activity From Magnet Grant: Analysis of Magnetic Field Detection. Four criteria must be met to demonstrate that an animal can detect and respond to MFs: 1. the MF must cause a behavioral response. 2. neuronal activity must be correlated with the presence of the MF. 3. the receptive sensory organ must be identified. 4. the ..

    Justification of c-Fos as a Marker of Neuronal Activity

From Magnet Grant:

Analysis of Magnetic Field Detection. Four criteria must be met to demonstrate that an

    animal can detect and respond to MFs: 1. the MF must cause a behavioral response. 2. neuronal activity must be correlated with the presence of the MF. 3. the receptive sensory organ must be identified. 4. the intracellular transduction mechanism of the field must be determined. Although there are many examples of lower vertebrates responding to MFs, e.g. for navigation during migration (Gould 1998), these four criteria have not been met for any vertebrate. The model that has come the closest to meeting all 4 criteria is in the trout (Walker, Diebel et al. 1997): 1. the fish can be operantly conditioned to associate a 50 µT MF with food reward, 2. MF-induced activity in the trigeminal nerves has been electrophysiologically recorded, and 3.tracing studies have demonstrated that the trigeminal nerves project to the basil lamina of the olfactory epithelium, the putative receptive organ, and 4. crystals of magnetite have been visualized within cells of the olfactory epithelium, providing a potential substrate for intracellular transduction of the MF.

    We will apply the same set of criteria to the analysis of static MF effects on rats. Our marker of a behavioral response will be both direct observation of post-exposure behaviors, and the expression of CTA. Our marker of neuronal activity will be c-Fos expression in the brain. We will use mutations of the inner ear to target potential receptive organs, and pharmacology to identify neurochemical substrates of MF transduction. The identification of the receptive organ will suggest possible cellular and intracellular transduction mechanisms, although intracellular analysis lies beyond the scope of this proposal.

    Conditioned Taste Aversion as a Behavioral Marker. As a form of associative learning

    by which an animal avoids a novel taste or food that has been previously paired with a toxin, CTA has been widely used as a marker of aversive effects caused by drugs and treatments. CTA learning is remarkably sensitive, and often reveals a treatment effect even when no other behavioral effect is detectable. Purely exteroceptive sensory stimuli, such as light or auditory cues produced by the MF or the apparatus, are likely to be ignored because CTAs overwhelmingly favor a novel taste as the conditioned stimulus (Garcia and Koelling 1966). Likewise, stressful effects of the exposure procedure, such as restraint or cutaneous discomfort, are not sufficient to act as the unconditioned stimulus in CTA learning (Garcia and Koelling 1966; Nolte, Pittman et al. 1998). Aversive effects that activate interoreceptors or induce nausea in humans, however, are favored to induce CTAs (Garcia and Koelling 1966); this increases the likelihood of measuring a behavioral effect that can be correlated with human self-reports of vertigo and nausea in high MFs (Schenck, Dumoulin et al. 1992; Kangarlu, Burgess et al. 1999). c-Fos Expression as a Neural Marker. As a marker of neural activity, c-Fos offers several

    advantages:

    1. c-Fos is a delayed marker of brain activation. The same neuronal process that mediate

    the rapid processes of neuronal activity and behavior at the time of stimulation may also

    initiate the slower processes of immediate-early gene activation and protein synthesis. Activation of the c-Fos gene by a sensory stimulus results in c-Fos protein synthesis within 1h (Morgan and Curran 1991). Because c-Fos is visualized 1 h after stimulation, there will be no interference of the magnet apparatus or MF stimulus with the visualization procedure.

    2. The pattern of c-Fos expression in the brain provides cellular resolution of neural

    activity that can be quantified by counting the number of labeled cells (Sagar, Sharp et al. 1988). The degree of c-Fos expression can then be correlated with quantifiable behavioral measures, such as the magnitude of CTA expression.

    3.c-Fos allows mapping of neuronal populations activated by a stimulus. The central

    processing of gustatory, visceral and vestibular sensation is mediated by many nuclei throughout the brain. Because many sections can be processed for c-Fos, activity in multiple brain regions of the same animal can be visualized for the analysis of a distributed network.

    4. The patterns of c-Fos expression can be interpreted against a large database of c-Fos

    literature. For example, c-Fos has been used extensively to map the sites involved in CTA acquisition and expression (Houpt, Philopena et al. 1994; Swank and Bernstein 1994; Houpt, Philopena et al. 1995; Swank, Schafe et al. 1995; Houpt, Philopena et al. 1996; Houpt, Philopena et al. 1996; Swank, Ellis et al. 1996), and the functional connections of the vestibular system (Kaufman, Anderson et al. 1991; Kaufman, Anderson et al. 1992; Kaufman, Anderson et al. 1993; Kaufman and Perachio 1994; Kitahara, Saika et al. 1995; Kitahara, Takeda et al. 1995; Cirelli, Popmeiano et al. 1996; Darlington, Lawlor et al. 1996; Kaufman 1996; Kim, Jin et al. 1997; Kitahara, Takeda et al. 1997; Marshburn, Kaufman et al. 1997; Sato, Tokuyama et al. 1997; Gustave Dit Duflo, Gestreau et al. 1999). Thus the c-Fos patterns (induced by MF exposure that also induces CTA and causes vestibular disturbances) will be immediately interpretable.

    c-Fos expression also has disadvantages. It is a postmortem technique, so the same rat cannot be repeatedly tested. Also, only a subset of activated neurons may be visualized, because some cells do not express c-Fos when activated. Although there are other ways to record or visualize neural activity that avoid these problems, most are impractical when applied to high MFs. Electrophysiological recordings using surface or indwelling metallic electrodes are confounded either by magnetic attraction or by induced currents. Functional MRI, in addition to having relatively low-resolution in small animals, is obviously confounded by the presence of the MF if the field itself is inducing neuronal activity. Other methods of measuring brain activity, such as brain imaging by PET or voltage-sensitive dyes, or neurotransmitter release by microdialysis, would be prohibitively cumbersome to conduct within the confines of the magnet’s bore.

From CTA Grant:

Summary of Lesion Studies. The literature on the effects of lesions on CTA are

    consistent with distributed processing of gustatory and of toxic stimuli, with different brain loci responsible for signal transduction, sensory processing, integration and association, and final output. Lesions of the input pathways responsible for transducing the toxic unconditioned stimuli block acquisition; lesions of the taste input pathways either attenuate responsiveness to tastants or block CTA acquisition (e.g. mPBN). Lesions of more rostral projection sites in the gustatory cortex and amygdala attenuate acquisition or expression of CTAs, possibly by injuring the mechanisms of association, consolidation and retention. Thus, the medial PBN appears to be a necessary relay during acquisition, while the gustatory cortex emerges as an apparently necessary site for mediating acquisition and expression of CTA. The amygdala also appears to be necessary for full acquisition and expression, but the precise role of specific amygdalar subnuclei and connections in CTA learning is still unclear.

    What is not clear from previous studies, however, is whether lesions that produce a deficit in CTA learning indicate localization of function in the site of injury or whether the lesions reveal necessary connections passing through or relayed by the lesion site from distant sites. Even if the cells in a brain site prove necessary, it is still possible that the site is a relay between other sites, and that no associative plasticity occurs there during CTA learning. Fixing the role of a site within the network requires tracking correlates of activity through the network.

    Neuronal Correlates of CTA Expression. There are only a few scattered reports, however,

    of neuronal activity correlated with CTA acquisition and expression. Shifts in the electrophysiological response of neurons to a standard gustatory stimulus after CTA acquisition in the NTS (Chang and Scott 1984), PBN (DiLorenzo 1985),

    amygdala(Yamamoto, Shimura et al. 1991), cortex (Yamamoto 1989), or

    elsewhere(Brozek, Buresova et al. 1974; Buresova, Aleksanyan et al. 1979) have been reported. Acetylcholine release in the n. accumbens is altered by CTA acquisition (Mark, Rada et al. 1992), and NMDA receptor phosphorylation increases in the gustatory cortex (Rosenblum, Berman et al. 1997). None of these neuronal correlates of CTA expression have been systematically characterized.

    c-Fos Expression as a Correlate of CTA Expression. We and others have

    observed(Houpt, Philopena et al. 1994; Swank and Bernstein 1994) that c-Fos expression in the medial intermediate NTS (iNTS) correlates well with CTA expression. Although unconditioned oral infusions of sucrose solution did not induce c-Fos in the iNTS under our conditions, after 3 pairings of sucrose with LiCl injections, intraoral infusion of sucrose produced an aversive behavioral display, and a significant increase in c-Fos expression in iNTS (Houpt, Philopena et al. 1994). LiCl alone, or sucrose after non-contingent pairing with LiCl did not reproduce this c-Fos pattern (Houpt, Philopena et al. 1994). In addition, the induction of c-Fos in the iNTS following CTA expression correlates well with the persistence, forgetting(Houpt, Philopena et al. 1996), and extinction(Houpt, Philopena et al. 1994) of the CTA; it is correlated with CTAs mediated by different tastes and toxins (Swank, Schafe et al. 1995; Houpt, Philopena et al. 1996; Thiele, Roitman et al. 1996); and it is not dependent on aversive behavioral responses

    (Swank, Schafe et al. 1995; Houpt, Philopena et al. 1996). While the expression of c-Fos is not dependent on abdominal vagal afferent or efferent fibers (Houpt, Berlin et al. 1997), it does require forebrain circuitry (Schafe, Seeley et al. 1995), including the CeA (Schafe and Bernstein 1996) and GC (Schafe and I.L. 1998).

    Analysis of c-Fos as a Novel Approach to the Neurobiology of CTA No other neuronal

    marker of CTA expression has correlated this well with the behavioral expression of a CTA. As a marker of neuronal activity, c-Fos expression has several advantages over other measures of activity:

    1. The mechanisms subserving CTA appear to form a distributed system with multiple brain sites activated by conditioned and unconditioned stimuli or generating conditioned responses. c-Fos expression can visualize activity in multiple brain regions of the same animal for the analysis of a distributed network.

    2. The pattern of c-Fos expression in the brain provides cellular resolution of neural activity(Sagar, Sharp et al. 1988)that can be quantified by counting the number of labeled cells or measuring the intensity of in situ hybridization. The degree of c-Fos expression

    can then be correlated with quantifiable behavioral measures.

    3. Expression of c-Fos also reveals the nature of well-characterized intracellular events accompanying neuronal activation (Sheng and Greenberg 1990). Thus c-Fos expression can serve as a starting point for the analysis of intracellular events within phenotypically-distinct neurons activated during CTA expression.

    4. Finally, c-Fos is itself a transcription factor that regulates the expression of target genes(Morgan and Curran 1991)involved in normal growth and plasticity during development (Grigoriadis, Wang et al. 1994), learning(Kaang, Kandel et al. 1993) , and recovery from injury (Jones and Evinger 1991; Weiser, Baker et al. 1993). It is a goal of our research to determine if c-Fos plays a physiological role in CTA by regulating gene expression and protein synthesis in specific brain regions critical for CTA acquisition or expression.

References

    Brozek, G., O. Buresova, et al. (1974). "Effect of bilateral cortical spreading depression

    on the hippocampal theta activity induced by oral infusion of aversive gustatory

    stimulus." Expt. Neurol. 42: 661-668.

    Buresova, O., Z. A. Aleksanyan, et al. (1979). "Electrophysiological analysis of retrieval

    of conditioned taste aversion in rats. Unit activity changes in critical brain

    regions." Physiol. Bohemoslov. 28: 525-536.

    Chang, F.-C. T. and T. R. Scott (1984). "Conditioned taste aversions modify neural

    responses in the rat nucleus tractus solitarius." J. Neurosci. 4: 1850-1862.

    Cirelli, C., M. Popmeiano, et al. (1996). "c-Fos expression in the rat brain after unilateral

    labyrinthectomy and its relation to the uncompensated and compensated stages."

    Neurosci. 70: 513-546.

    Darlington, C. L., P. Lawlor, et al. (1996). "Temporal relationship between the

    expression of Fos, Jun and Krox-24 in the guinea pig vestibular nuclei during the

    development of vestibular compensation for unilateral vestibular deafferentation."

    Brain Res 735: 173-176.

    DiLorenzo, P. M. (1985). "Responses to NaCl of parabrachial units that were conditioned

    with intravenous LiCl." Chem. Senses 10: 438.

    Garcia, J. and R. A. Koelling (1966). "Relation of cue to consequence in avoidance

    learning." Psychonomic Sci. 4: 123-124.

    Gould, J. L. (1998). "Sensory bases of navigation." Current Biology 8: R731-738.

    Grigoriadis, A. E., Z.-Q. Wang, et al. (1994). "c-Fos: a key regulator of osteoclast-

    macrophage lineage determination and bone remodeling." Sciecne 266: 443-448.

    Gustave Dit Duflo, S., C. Gestreau, et al. (1999). "Fos expression the cat brainstem after

    unilateral vestibular neurectomy." Brain Res 824: 1-17.

    Houpt, T. A., R. A. Berlin, et al. (1997). "Subdiaphragmatic vagotomy does not attenuate

    c-Fos induction in the nucelus of the solitary tract after conditioned taste aversion

    expression." Brain Res. 747: 85-91.

    Houpt, T. A., J. M. Philopena, et al. (1995). "c-Fos expression in the nucleus of the

    solitary tract following conditioned taste aversion formation." Appetite 24: 84.

    Houpt, T. A., J. M. Philopena, et al. (1996). "c-Fos induction in the rat nucleus of the

    solitary tract by intraoral quinine infusion depends on prior pairing of quinine and

    lithium chloride." Physiol. Behav. 60: 1535-41.

    Houpt, T. A., J. M. Philopena, et al. (1996). "c-Fos induction in the rat nucleus of the

    solitary tract correlates with the retention and forgetting of a conditioned taste

    aversion." Learn. Mem. 3: 25-30.

    Houpt, T. A., J. M. Philopena, et al. (1994). "Increased c-Fos expression in the rat

    nucleus of the solitary tract after conditioned taste aversion formation." Neurosci.

    Lett. 172: 1-5.

    Jones, K. J. and C. Evinger (1991). "Differential neuronal expression of c-fos proto-

    oncogene following peripheral nerve injury or chemically-induced seizure." J.

    Neurosci.Res. 28: 291-298.

    Kaang, B.-K., E. R. Kandel, et al. (1993). "Activation of cAMP-responsive genes by

    stimuli that produce long-term facilitation in Aplysia sensory neurons." Neuron

    10: 427-435.

    Kangarlu, A., r. E. Burgess, et al. (1999). "Cognitive, cardiac, and physiological safety

    studies in ultra high field magnetic resonance imaging." Magn. Reson. Imag. 17:

    1407-1416.

    Kaufman, G. D. (1996). "Activation of immediate-early genes by vestibular stimulation."

    Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 781: 437-442.

    Kaufman, G. D., J. H. Anderson, et al. (1991). "Activation of a specific vestibulo-olivary

    pathway by centripetal acceleration in rat." Brain Res. 562: 311-317.

    Kaufman, G. D., J. H. Anderson, et al. (1992). "Fos-defined activity in rat brainstem

    following centripetal acceleration." J. Neurosci. 12: 4489-4500.

    Kaufman, G. D., J. H. Anderson, et al. (1993). "Otolith-brain stem connectivity: evidence

    for differential neural activation by vestibular hair cells based on quantification of

    Fos expression in unilateral labyrinthectomized rats." J. Neurophysiol. 70: 117-

    127.

    Kaufman, G. D. and A. A. Perachio (1994). "Translabyrinth electrical stimulation for the

    induction of immediate early genes in the gerbil brainstem." Brain Res. 646: 345-

    350.

    Kim, M. S., B. K. Jin, et al. (1997). "Effect of MK801 on cFos-like protein expression in

    the medial vestibular nucleus at early stage of vestibular compensation in

    uvulonodullectomized rats." Neurosci. Lttrs. 231: 147-150.

    Kitahara, T., T. Saika, et al. (1995). "Changes in fos and jun expression in the rat

    brainstem in the process of vestibular compensation." Acta Otolaryngol. 520:

    S401-S404.

    Kitahara, T., N. Takeda, et al. (1995). "Effects of MK801 on Fos expression in the rat

    brainstem after unilateral labyrintectomy." Brain Res. 700: 182-190.

    Kitahara, T., N. Takeda, et al. (1997). "Role of the flocculus in the development of

    vestibular compensation: immunohistochemical studies with retograde tracing and

    flocculectomy using fos expression as a marker in the rat brainstem." Neurosci.

    76: 571-580.

    Mark, G. P., P. Rada, et al. (1992). "Cholinergic activity in the nucleus accumbens may

    be inversely related to food intake." Appetite 19: 201.

    Marshburn, T. H., G. D. Kaufman, et al. (1997). "Saccule contribution to immediate early

    gene induction in the gerbil brainstem with posterior canal galvanic or

    hypergravity stimulation." Brain Res. 761: 51-58.

    Morgan, J. I. and T. Curran (1991). "Stimulus-transcription coupling in the nervous

    system: Involvement of the inducible proto-oncogenes fos and jun." Ann. Rev.

    Neurosci. 14: 421-451.

    Nolte, C. M., D. W. Pittman, et al. (1998). "Magnetic field conditioned taste aversion in

    rats." Physiol. Behav. 63: 683-688.

    Rosenblum, K., D. E. Berman, et al. (1997). "NMDA receptor and the tyrosine

    phosphorylation of its 2B subunit in taste learning in the rat insular cortex." J.

    Neurosci. 17: 5129-5135.

    Sagar, S. M., F. R. Sharp, et al. (1988). "Expression of c-fos protein in brain: metabolic

    mapping at the cellular level." Science 240: 1328-1331.

    Sato, T., W. Tokuyama, et al. (1997). "Temporal and spatial dissociation of expression

    patterns between Zif268 and c-Fos in rat inferior olive during vestibular

    compensation." NeuroReport 8: 1891-1895.

    Schafe, G. E. and I. L. Bernstein (1996). "Forebrain contribution to the induction of a

    brainstem correlate of conditioned taste aversion: I. The amygdala." Brain Res.

    741: 109-116.

    Schafe, G. E. and B. I.L. (1998). "Forebrain contribution to the induction of a brainstem

    correlate of conditioned taste aversion. II. Insular (gustatory) cortex." Brain Res.

    800: 40-47.

    Schafe, G. E., R. J. Seeley, et al. (1995). "Forebrain contributions to the induction of a

    cellular correlate of conditioned taste aversion in the nucleus of the solitary tract."

    J. Neurosci. 15: 6789-6796.

    Schenck, J. F., C. L. Dumoulin, et al. (1992). "Human exposure to 4.0-Tesla magnetic

    fields in a whole body scanner." Med. Phys. 19: 1089-1098.

    Sheng, M. and M. E. Greenberg (1990). "The regulation and function of c-fos and other

    immediate early genes in the nervous system." Neuron 7: 477-485.

    Swank, M. W. and I. L. Bernstein (1994). "c-Fos induction in response to a conditioned

    stimulus after single trial taste aversion learning." Brain Res. 636: 202-208.

    Swank, M. W., A. E. Ellis, et al. (1996). "c-Fos antisense blocks acquisition and

    extinction of conditioned taste aversion in mice." Neuroreport 7: 1866-1870.

    Swank, M. W., G. E. Schafe, et al. (1995). "c-Fos induction in response to taste stimuli

    previously paired with amphetamine or LiCl during taste aversion learning."

    Brain Res. 673: 251-261.

    Thiele, T. E., M. F. Roitman, et al. (1996). "c-Fos induction in rat brainstem in response

    to ethanol- and lithium chloride-induced conditioned taste aversions." Alcohol.

    Clin. Exp. Res. 20: 1023-1028.

    Walker, M. M., C. E. Diebel, et al. (1997). "Structure and function of the vertebrate

    magnetic sense." Nature 390: 371-376.

    Weiser, M., H. Baker, et al. (1993). "Axotomy-induced differential gene induction in

    neurons of the locus ceruleus and substantia nigra." Mol. Brain Res. 17: 319-327.

    Yamamoto (1989). "Taste responses of cortical neurons in freely ingesting rats." J.

    Neurophysiol. 61: 1244-1258.

    Yamamoto, T., T. Shimura, et al. (1991). "Role of the amygdala in conditioned taste

    avesion learning in the rat." Neurosci. Res. Suppl. 16: S140.

Report this document

For any questions or suggestions please email
cust-service@docsford.com