January - February 2005 - Volume 15, Number 4 - AgEBB

By Ray Ferguson,2014-12-22 04:23
16 views 0
January - February 2005 - Volume 15, Number 4 - AgEBB4,4,4

Ag Opportunities

    Volume 15, Number 4

    January-February 2005


Considering a Small Vineyard

By Paul Gospodarczyk

    Fruit Science Student, SMSU

    Starting a small vineyard can be a risky endeavor. This project requires a large amount of capital to start, and returns are not realized for a number of years. With only a few acres it may be difficult to find a winery or other processor, who will sign a contract committing to buy the yearly crop. It may be possible to sell to home winemakers, but this market is limited. If table grapes are grown they can be sold fresh at farmers markets or roadside stands. It

    is important to locate a market before investing money and time into this kind of project.

    However, you may decide the benefits of a small vineyard outweigh the potential risks. This could be a good way to utilize fallow land, provide meaningful interaction with customers, or present an enjoyable retirement challenge. Whatever the reasons may be, it is important they are worth the hard labor and financial risk.

    The equipment for a small farm is different from what is used by major producers. Most current publications and cost analyses investigate vineyard establishment on a very large scale. This article will address the needs of smaller scale growers for sprayers, equipment, tools and yearly supplies. Other areas of establishment, such as land, irrigation, the trellis and the actual grapevines, are very similar to

    the information presented in other publications.

    In the humid Midwest, the grape canopy must be sprayed in order to maintain diseases. Therefore, the firs area to review is the type of sprayer necessary for the intended size of the vineyard. If a sprayer tank is too small for the intended are of coverage the grower will spend excessive time refilling the tank and traveling between

    vineyards and filling station. If the tank is too large the grower has wasted money by buying a more expensive tool than the job requires. So, the object is to match the sprayer to the vineyard size.

    A simple 50 gallon sprayer that attaches to the 3 point hitch of a tractor can effectively cover 1-3 acres. However, when nearing the 3 acre size a large amount of time will be spent refillingespecially


    the sprayer is calibrated to cover 100 gal/acre. If the vineyard is intended to be 3-6 acres it would be a better decision to use a 100 gallon sprayer that also attaches to the 3 point hitch. A vineyard larger than 6 acres warrants the investment of a 300 gallon trailer sprayer.

    The tractor used for a small farm should be based on the power requirements of the sprayer. The 50 gallon sprayer needs a tractor from 25-30 hp to operate sufficiently. A 100 gallon sprayer works best with a 40 hp tractor and the 300 gallon trailer should be operated with a tractor nearing 60 hp. It is important to check with the width dimension on any tractor over 30 hp to be sure it will fit between vineyard rows. Implements are readily available for all these ranges of power; including 25-30 hp tractors.

    One of the most important implements for the tractor is a mower. Grapevines don’t grow well with competition so it is important to cut

    down vegetation in the row middles. An end loader is also valuable to growers for many random tasks that seem to surface frequently in vineyard work. A 9 inch post hole digger is necessary to set the posts of the trellis system. This tool can be purchased with the tractor or it is possible to rent from a local hardware or farm supply store. For the amount of posts that need to be installed it is not advisable to use a hand-held auger.

    A wide variety of tools are needed to train and maintain the grapevines. A good pair of pruning shears is needed for every person working in the field crew. If the field crew is only a single person, be sure to have an extra pair of shears available. The natural growth pattern of vines is to sprawl out across the ground. A tapener is used to hold these shoots up on the trellis. A 300’ tape measure is

    necessary to lay out all the posts for the trellis system. When it is time to install the trellis system it is wise to have a shovel and pinch point crew bar available; even if a post hole digger is being used. A pinch point crow bar is a long bar with a pointed end which will break through rocks in the soil.

    Finally, there are supplies used on a yearly basis. The tapener must be outfitted with tape and staples. One package of tape holds 24-150’

    rolls. Staples come in boxes of 5,000. For starting a vineyard, a package of tape and box of staples for every acre of grapes. A rough estimate of fuel consumption is 30 gal/acre every year.


    Equipment - Edgeller and Haper, 417-962-4846; John Deere Dealer, www.deere.com

    Sprayer - Stephens Sales Com, Ralph Stephens, 417-754-2578 Tools and Supplies - Hummer International, www.hummert.com

    Note: Keep in mind that an air blast sprayer is generally used to spray the canopy and is not used for herbicides that are sprayed under the vines. A good resource that describes the different types of sprayers for small vineyards is Small Sprayers for Smaller Vineyards by Andrew Landers, Pesticide Application Technology Specialist, Cornell Univ found at


Small Vineyard Establishment Budget


    25hp tractor $12,000

    End loader $3,000

    40 hp tractor $17,500

    End loader $4,800

    60 hp tractor $22,000

    End loader $4,800

    6’ PTO mower $1,200

    9" post hole digger $850


    50 gallon PTO $4,200

    100 gallon PTO $6,200

    300 gallon PTO $10,500


    Pruning shears $22

    Tapener $60

    100’ tape measure $40

    Shovel $20

    Pinch point crow bar $20


    Tape 24-250’ rolls/box $25

    Staples 5,000/carton $5

    Diesel fuel 30 gallons/acre


Graded Goat Market

Missouri’s first graded goat sale—from the MO Dept of Ag/USDAopened

    in September 2004. The Oregon County Goat and Sheep Market at the Oregon County Buying Station (OCBS) in Koshkonong started the sale to provide new markets for MO producers.

―The number of goats sold in MO doubled between 1997 and 2002. As this

    trend continues, it will be important for producers to have more markets when it’s time to sell, ― said Lloyd Wilson, director of MDA’s

    Market Information and Outreach Division.

    The OCBS has negotiated agreements with buyers to provide new markets by offering buyers USDA graded animals. The USDA grades, determined by

    MDA graders, are used to determine the value of each animal.

    Pricing for the goats is determined using a formula combining the actual slaughter value, prices at other USDA grade sales, the USDA grade, and freight to the buyers. To check prices in advance, sellers can call the OCBS at 417-280-0471.

    Goats will be graded and purchased on the third Thursdays of every month. Market information from the OCBS will be available from MDA the day after each sale.

    Prices well be available in the Weekly Market Summary at www.mda.mo.gov/Market/pdf/weeklysummary.pdf or on the Market News Hotline at 573-522-9244. For more information call Greg Onstott at 573-751-7765. (Small Farm Today, Nov 2004)


    Voluntary premise registration begins in 2005 for MO Animal ID Program

by Dr. Robert Larson

    The MO Dept of Ag has been working with the USDA in the development of

    a National Animal Identification System (NAIS) to enable quick response and animal trace-back in the case of a disease outbreak. Starting Jan 3, 2005, the MO Animal ID Program will begin voluntary registration of premises in the state. Through voluntary premises registration, a unique identification number will be assigned to locations where animals are born, managed, marketed or exhibited. Information gathered through registration will be used solely by the MO Dept of Ag and USDA for animal health purposes. This critical data will provide local and national animal health officials with necessary contact information in case of a disease concern. Premises identification numbers can be obtained by completing the registration process online at www.mda.mo.gov. Registration can also be completed by filling out a paper form and mailing it or faxing it to the MO Dept of Ag. National Animal ID Effort in MO, go to:




    Research Hopes to Make Elderberries Profitable in Missouri

By Dave Burton,

    MU Civic Communications Specialist

    Since 1999, there has been an elderberry study underway at the Univ of

    MO’s Southwest Research Center near Mt Vernon. Funded, in part by a

    grant from the USDA, the study is focused on determining which elderberry cultivar grows best in southwest MO.

    Not as popular as strawberries, blackberries or blueberries, the elderberry is actually a native MO shrub that produces an edible purple fruit native to the Ozarks.

    The fruit, which is rich in vitamins, iron, potassium and protein, makes excellent jellies, syrups, desserts, and food colorings. The

    flowers are also edible, often prepared as fritters or used to flavor jellies and wines. The bark, leaves, flowers, and fruit all have medicinal properties and have been used for thousands of years to treat a variety of ailments.

    One successful example of elderberry wine production exists in Wichita, KS, where a winery is using 130,000 pounds of elderberries a

    year to produce a high quality wine that has been competing with CA grape wines. Elderberries are particularly suited to wine-making because of their ideal balance of tannins, acids and sugars, and their deep purple color.

    Some of the cultivars being used in the research here in southwest MO were obtained from NY and Canada and those plants are showing signs of

    not doing well in the MO climate according to Andrew Thomas, horticulture research associated, Univ of MO.

    The study also includes more than 40 elderberry plants, gathering them from different locations in MO, KS and Oklahoma.

    According to Thomas, the study stemmed from a renewed interest in alternative, but native, Ozarks fruits.

―The ultimate goal of the study is to release a named variety or two

    of elderberries that will grow very well in MO. I’m pretty confident

    we can do that,‖ said Thomas.

    Thomas is gathering information on the growth, vigor, cane production and disease and insect susceptibility of the berries in this research project, which is also being replicated by Pat Byers at the SMSU Fruit Experiment Station in Mountain Grove.

―The focus of our study is to learn how to grow elderberries to get

    the optimum yield,‖ said Thomas. ―We are also looking to see if

    pruning is a better option or if brush hogging it to the ground every year and then letting it grow up in stages produces a higher yield.‖

    Thomas expects the experiment to continue over the next four or five years.

―This is probably the largest elderberry research project going on in

    the country right now,‖ said Thomas. ―We believe the elderberry has

    good potential as a commercial fruit crop in MO, but many basic questions related to its culture remain unanswered.‖

    According to Thomas, basic research, combined with development of high-quality products and creative marketing by producers could make this tough, native plant an important part of an

    increasingly-diversified MO agriculture.

    You can learn more about the Elderberry research project at the 25th Annual MO Small Fruit and Vegetable Conference, Feb 21 23, 2005 in

    Springfield. This event is jointly organized by Southwest MO State Univ and Univ of MO Extension.

    More information (including a schedule and registration information) can be found online at http://mtngrv.smsu.edu. You may also contact Patrick Byers, SMSU Department of Fruit Science at 417-417-926-4105 or

    Pamela Mayer at 417-926-4105 to register or for information on registration fees.

    For more info on elderberries, contact Andrew Thomas, horticulture research associate, Southwest Research Center, Mt Vernon, MO, 417-466-2148, thomasal@missouri.edu.


More on the Solar-Heated Greenhouse

    By Andrew L. Thomas, Anastasia Becker and Richard J. Crawford, Jr

The Southwest Center’s solar-heated greenhouse has recently been

    planted with cool-season crops for its 17th winter season. If you haven’t had the chance to see this unheated greenhouse in action, we hope you’ll stop by this winter. After many years of experience and

    hundreds of questions about every conceivable aspect of the greenhouse, we are pleased to finally lay to rest one of the most persistent, important, and often-asked questions: That is, whether metal or plastic barrels are best for storing water which gathers, holds, and releases heat back into the greenhouse at night. And the answer is: It doesn’t matter!

    Last winter we conducted a study measuring water temperatures at various times of day and under different weather conditions in both

    metal and plastic barrels in the greenhouse for several weeks. We drained four test barrels (two plastic and two metal), repainted them with the same glossy black paint, and refilled each with exactly 56 gallons of fresh water. The test barrels were placed evenly and randomly across the top row of barrels; these steps ensured us that the only difference between barrels was their structural material of metal or plastic. We used an electronic thermometer with 0.1 ?F precision to take water temperature readings.

    Going into this, we suspected that metal barrels might have a slight advantage over plastic in accumulating heat because they tend to feel warmer to the human hand on sunny days. It follows, we thought, that if the metal barrels seem to be warming up more when sunlight strikes them, perhaps that heat would transfer on through to the water and accumulate for release back into the greenhouse at night. But our experiment revealed no differences whatsoever in heat gain advantage by either type of barrel.

Since we now know that barrel structural material doesn’t make any

    difference in terms of heat-holding capacity, let’s look at the many

    other factors one might consider when procuring barrels for water storage in greenhouses. Perhaps the most important feature is how much water a barrel will hold. We were surprised to find that our plastic barrels each held 4.3 gallons more water than our metal barrels. When multiplied by the 20 barrels we have in the greenhouse, that adds up to an extra 86 gallons of important heat-holding water. By using these particular plastic barrels, we have literally added the equivalent of another 1? barrels to the greenhouse without taking up any more space.

    But before we begin to think too favorably of plastic, we did have a problem with them. In summer, 2003, two plastic barrels on the bottom layer collapsed. Presumably the plastic material weakened due to constant exposure to ultraviolet radiation and the heavy unrelenting weight they were bearing. It is unlikely that this type of plastic barrel is designed to be UV-resistant, nor designed for heavy-duty long-term use. Therefore, they simply may not last a long time in the greenhouse. On the other hand, our metal barrels can, and did, rust. The tiniest rust hole in the bottom of a metal barrel will eventually allow all the water to drain out, and you may not even know it (this happened to us!).

    The conclusion of all this is that neither metal nor plastic barrels seem to have a clear advantage in this type of greenhouse setting. Because we now know that there is virtually no difference in thermal

    characteristics between the two types of barrels, and keeping in mind that no barrel will last forever, probably three main criteria will determine which type of barrels you choose: cost, availability, and size. Whatever type of inexpensive barrels are locally available will likely suffice. If, however, one can determine that a particular type of barrel can hold more water than another, the larger barrel would probably be a better choice. Beyond these little nuances, the real bottom line is that it really doesn’t matter which barrel we use as

    long as we are able to store water in some sort of safe and efficient manner. We are quite glad to finally put this persistent question to rest so that we can focus our energy and curiosity on more important components of this amazing solar-heated winter greenhouse system.


*** In Print ***

    *Society for the Preservation of Poultry Antiquities Breeders Directory* available from Glenn Drowns, 1878 230th St, Calamus IA 52729, $8.

*Community-Based Deer Management: A Practitioner’s Guide* helps

    wildlife managers and communities solve deer problems. Contact Cornell Coop Extension Resource Center, PO Box 2884, Ithaca NY 14852-3884, 607-255-2080, www.cce.cornell.edu/store.

    *Publications of the Missouri State Fruit Experiment Station* can be found at http://library.smsu.edu/paulevans/FES/fespubs1.shtml

    *Pest Proof Your Farm or Ranch: A Whole Farm Approach to Managing Pests* This free 20-page bulletin helps producers design farm-wide approaches to control pests. It lays out basic ecological principles for managing pests and suggests how to apply them to real farm situations. www.sare.org/publications/farmpest.htm.

    *Micro Eco-Farms: Provide a Way for Backyard to Small-Acreage Growers to Create Abundance*Find more information about Micro Eco-Farming at www.nwpub.net, including free downloads of the entire first chapter and the Resources section of the book. To order, call 888281-5170 or

    send $20.95 to New World Publishing, 11543 Quartz Dr #1, Auburn, CA 95602.

    *Processed Foods for Improved Livelihoods* as Number 5 in its FAO

    Diversification Booklets series. FAO Diversification Booklets aim to raise awareness and provide information about opportunities at the farm and local community level to increase small-scale farmer income. This 65-page publication describes some of the opportunities and constraints faced by communities in developing countries that wish to introduce or improve food processing. It focuses on secondary processing, in which fresh foods or the products of primary processing are made into processed foods such as bread, wine/beer, fermented pickles, etc. www.fao.org/biotech/news_list.asp?Cat=131

    *Building Better Rural Places* a newly revised 160-page guide to 82 federal programs offering assistance in agriculture, forestry, conservation, and rural community development. Download the entire publication or view ordering information at


    *Small Farm Quarterly* a relatively new publication from Cornell Univ’s Small Farms website: www.smallfarms.cornell.edu Previous issues

    can be read by clicking ―Read About Small Farm Quarterly.‖

    *The Grassfed Gourmet Cookbook* Presents an insider's view of how best to buy and prepare grassfed beef, lamb, pork, poultry, rabbits, venison, bison ,veal and dairy products along with over 125 recipes. It can also serve as a marketing tool for pasture-based farmers. It includes easy-to-understand cutting instructions and explanations for consumers interested in purchasing whole, half or quarter animals, includes a chapter on how consumers can best work directly with farmers, as well as a farmer directory. Farmers interested in being included in the directory for future editions of the book, or to purchase the book, contact Shannon Hayes at shayes@midtel.net. For more info, visit www.eatingfresh.com


*** IN THE NEWS ***

On Dec 8, 2004, The US Senate passed the Specialty Crop

Competitiveness Act authorizing the nation’s first major federal

    funding program for the fresh produce industry. The Specialty Crop Competitiveness Act of 2004 approved by the Senate will authorize $54 million annually for five years to enhance the competitiveness of each state’s fresh produce crops. The majority of the funding will come in the form of block grants through the state department of agriculture.

Report this document

For any questions or suggestions please email