I Am An Englishman - The Real New World Order (World Government, Illegal Immigration, Pollution & Population Control, Protocols Of Zion)

By Rick Gibson,2014-03-21 17:46
10 views 0
I Am An Englishman - The Real New World Order (World Government, Illegal Immigration, Pollution & Population Control, Protocols Of Zion)

Israel Zangwill, was an English-born Jew, whose parents had previously fled Russia.

    His father was considered to be enough an enemy of the Russian state to be sentenced to death in absentia.

    Zangwill was active in the suffragette and pacifist movements and was a member of the left-wing Fabian Society. He also founded the Jewish Territorial Organisation and was one the leading Zionists of his time.

In his 1921 book, The Voice of Jerusalem, Zangwill wrote:

    "Men form one universal brotherhood… their individual lives, their nations and races, interbreed and blend and go on to merge again at last in one common human… This conclusion was in fact the starting-point of Hebrew literature… the co-existence of this

    covenant of co-operation, this new world order, would… reduce racial frictions to a

    minimum by the world-policy of the open door… In particular, boundary questions could be denuded of their significance…

    Bolshevism may be good or bad, but the United States of Russia would be in greater congruity with World-Peace than a swarm of conflicting nationalities; and if the Bolshevists can succeed in re-uniting them, they will to that extent be promoting the larger and truer ideal".

    "One universal brotherhood", "Interbreed and blend", "New World Order", "World-policy of the open door", "Boundary questions denuded of their significance", "Bolshevism may be good", "United States of Russia would be in greater congruity with World-Peace than a swarm of conflicting nationalities".

    Dont you get it yet, England?

Do you really not get it?

    Zangwill wrote this 84 years ago and the plan is considerably older than that. Love of the land? - No!

    Love of country? - No!

    Love of family, neighbourhood and clan, pride in your British identity? No! No! No! The tribe must die, the "World-policy of the open door" must be adhered to and you must "interbreed"!

    And if you dont do as we demand we will organise protest groups who will call you nasty names wherever you congregate: Neo-Nazi! Fascist! Dinosuar! White Supremacist! Bigot! Hater! AntiSemite! Racist!

    And if you dont do as we say, we will use our ownership of the media and we will create strong, positive images of the alien man and weak, soft and pathetic images of the indigenous man and we will trick your young women into breeding with them and scorning you!

    And if you dont do as we want we will use our ownership of the politicians to criminalise your refusal!

In his February, 1919, essay, Before The Peace Conference, Zangwill lets us know

    who will be running the show when the New World Order's dirty, little game is finally won, and where the capital of the Order will be.

    "With the arrival in France of President Wilson, the champion of the League of Nations, the most momentous episode in all human history begins, the true 'War for the World' ... If mankind thus builds a brotherhood, the immeasurable slaughter and suffering of the war will be redeemed, and the prophetic gospel of ancient Judea will come to its own at last...

    Judaism stands to gain also a minor traditional hope from the Peace Conference: the repossession of Palestine, and if this secondary consummation could be united with the setting up of Jerusalem as the seat of the League of Nations, instead of the bankrupt Hague, the two Hebraic dreams, the major and the minor, would be fused in one and the Hebrew metropolis, that meeting-point of three world-religions, would become at once the centre and symbol of the new era".

    A world government, with Jerusalem as its capital?

Hmmm. Now where have I heard this before?

    If "mankind builds a brotherhood" there will be no more war?

    Tell that to the 55 million who died in WWII, old son. And the Koreans, the Tibetans, the Vietnamese, the poor in South America and Africa, the Palestinians and Iraqis etc.

In the collected Speeches, articles and letters of Israel Zangwill, London, 1937,

    Zangwill tells us that the philosophy of "interbreed and blend" lined up for the rest of us, will not be not for him or his own tribe.

On page 336 he says:

    "I say that without the vision of a League of Nations the whole world will perish… It is the vision of our own Isaiah:

    'They shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning-hooks: nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.'

    In such a world, if it emerges, would it matter if we Jews did have a single nationality, if within all these leagued nations there was this still finer core of comradeship?… instead of disavowing the brotherhood of Israel let us proclaim, from our Jerusalem centre, the brotherhood of man".

    So, the Jew "interbreeds" the rest of the world into a happy-clappy, dumbed down, racially and culturally indistinct melting pot, whilst he still hovers benignly above the hodge-podge, a distinct "single nationality".

    Does this ring any bells, Mr. England?

    Do you think this Jew will want to blend in with us khaki fellows when his vision is finally made flesh? Do you think he will be prepared to be a dustbin man in this fawnly similar Utopia?

    Or do you think he will still be giving the orders?

    In 1908, Zangwill created a storm in America. He was the author of the most popular play of that year.

    Zangwill called his play, The Melting Pot.

The plot of Zangwills play did not contradict its title.

    Jews just like Zangwill decided long ago what was going to happen to the Russians, the Germans, the European-Americans and the British, and they did it, didnt they?

    By God they did.

    Just in case you think that Zangwill's goals were wholly unrepresentative of anyone other than himself, 65 years after he wrote the above, the Havard Professor, Noel Ignatiev, wrote the following in the September-October, 2002, edition of Harvard


    "The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists."

    So, in just about the most classic example of "incitement to racial hatred" that you are ever going to come across, the youth of America are informed that the abolition of the white race is a "desirable" thing.

    Has this "racist" boffin ever been castigated for voicing such an opinion? Has he been kicked out of Harvard? Have the media and the PC politicians howled this ant-white racist out of the country?

    Oh no, none of these things have occurred. You see, the learned prof preaches his genocidal philosophy at the W.E.B. DuBois Institute for African-American Research, an institution whose courses, as you might imagine, are almost wholly taken up by black Americans.

    And Iganatiev, himself, is a Jew.

    And, in this day and age, we do not hold the Jew to account, even if he advocates the extinction of our race to those who are, perhaps, most likely to take his advocacy seriously.

Iganatiev's own journal and website, Race Traitor, is dedicated to the philosophy he

    espouses above.

In the same Harvard Magazine article from which the quotation above was taken, he

    promises us that:

    "Race Traitor will not abandon its focus on whiteness... The editors meant it when they replied to a reader:

    'Make no mistake about it: we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as 'the white race' is destroyed-not 'deconstructed' but destroyed."

    From the 11th to the 13th of April, 1997, a three-day conference was held in Berkeley, California whose theme was: The Making and Unmaking of Whiteness.

Iganatiev titled his own offering to this symposium: The Point Is Not To Interpret

    Whiteness But To Abolish It. This, in part, is what he said on that occasion:

"We are anti-white… We hold that so-called whites must cease to exist… white people

    must commit suicide as whites in order to come alive as workers, or youth, or women, or whatever other identity can induce them to change from the miserable, petulant, subordinated creatures they now are into freely associated, fully developed human subjects…

    When it comes to abolishing the white race, the task is… to gather together a minority determined to make it impossible for anyone to be white".

If you were to visit Iganatiev's website, which can be found here:

     you would find this statement of


    "The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race... Until that task is accomplished, even partial reform will prove elusive…

    The existence of the white race depends on the willingness of those assigned to it to place their racial interests above class, gender, or any other interests they hold… Race Traitor

    aims to serve as an intellectual center for those seeking to abolish the white race… Treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity."

    Finally, this pearl of Iganatievan wisdom is taken from the Spring, 1994, edition of Race Traitor:

    "Up to now the philosophers have merely interpreted the white race; the point, however, is to abolish it. How can this be done?

    We know how devilishly difficult it is for individuals to escape whiteness… But we also know that when there comes into being a critical mass of people who, though they look white, have ceased to act white, the white race will undergo fission, and former whites will be able to take part, together with others, in building a new human community." The New Human Community will, of course, be coffee-coloured, except for a very few at the top of the coffee shop, who will all bear an unremarkable resemblance to the grim-reaping wannabe and the interbreed-and-blend, Jack Straw look-alike shown below.

    If you think the ultimate goals of the above are just the ravings of a couple of demented, top-of-the-tree loonies, check out the following info:

    On the 10th of December, 1973, National Security Council Memorandum 200,

    Implications of Worldwide Population Growth for U.S. Security and Overseas Interests, was added to the USA's list of "Classified and Confidential" documents. It was declassified, perhaps in error, in 1988.

The memo said:

    "If future numbers are to be kept within reasonable bounds, it is urgent that measures to reduce fertility be started and made effective in the 1970s and 1980s."

    The Rockefeller Foundation's 1975 annual report echoed the sentiment above, saying:

    "We are one world and there will be one future; for better or for worse, for us all. Central to the new ethic... is controlled economic growth... It is also necessary to control fertility." On the 12th of September, 1999, the BBC reported thus:

    "Average sperm count in Britain fell from a high of 113 million per millilitre in 1940 to 66 million in 1990."

    On the 2nd of March, 2000, the BBC reported thus:

    "The addition of iodine to salt is to blame for low sperm counts, claim scientists. They tested the theory on rats and found that starving them of iodine led to increased sperm production and larger testicle sizes.

    They therefore deduced that iodine was responsible for smaller testicle size and lower sperm counts.

    Iodine is needed by the body to make the thryoid hormone thyroxine, which is vital for developing brains. A deficiency can cause impaired mental development and it is therefore added to salt to aid brain development."

On the 1st of September, 2000, the BBC reported thus:

    "Scientists on Svalbard have found that more than one in a hundred of the islands' polar bears are hermaphroditic.

    The condition, in which an animal possesses the reproductive organs of both sexes, affects wildlife in various parts of the world. It is thought to be caused by exposure to chemicals which affect the endocrine system.

    The chemicals blamed for the Svalbard bears' condition are PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls), which are damaging their immune systems.

    The phenomenon was unknown on the Arctic islands, which lie between Norway and the North Pole, a decade ago…

    PCBs were manufactured for use in electrical equipment, and although many countries have now banned them there is a reservoir of the chemicals that has escaped into the environment.

    Although little pollution originates on Svalbard, the prevailing southerly winds dump contamination from industrial Europe on to the islands.

    Elizabeth Salter, of WWF, the global environment campaign, told BBC News Online: 'It seems to be the female bears on Svalbard that are acquiring male genitalia, a penis-like stump. With other species affected by endocrine disrupters, it's more often the males that have genital abnormalities. And what's happening to the bears is happening to gulls in the Arctic, too, because of PCBs, DDT and dioxins'."

    On the 3rd of September, 2000, Anthony Browne said this in The Observer:

    "Whites will be an ethnic minority in Britain by the end of the century. Analysis of official figures indicate that, at current fertility rates and levels of immigration, there will be more non-whites than whites by 2100."

    On the 27th of July, 2001, the BBC reported thus:

    "Exposure to pesticides and solvents could be contributing to falling sperm counts and rising levels of male infertility… Exposure to pesticides was significantly associated with sperm levels well below the limit for male fertility…

    Dwindling sperm counts have been a cause of concern since Danish researchers reported in 1992 that sperm counts worldwide were declining.

    Many experts blame environmental factors for the decline, as well as for an increase in testicular cancer. A study by French and Argentinian researchers appears to confirm that theory…

    The men who were exposed to pesticides also had higher levels of two female sex hormones in their system than men who had not come into contact with pesticides." Dr Luc Multigner, of the French research institute INSERM, said the results suggested that the pesticides were having a toxic effect on the testicles and other sex glands. He said: 'The testicles are one of the most vulnerable organs to environmental, physical and chemical agents'."

    1n 2002, we could have read the following in the The Spectator:

    "If Tony Blair has anything to do with it, there wont always be an England. The country

    is already fading, not from foreign conquest but from its own immigration policy. Demographic calculations have it that by the end of this new century the English people will be a minority in their homeland.

    Just think about it. Fifty years ago, there were only a few tens of thousands of non-whites in all of Great Britain, but in the next one hundred years, the whites will probably be a minority. And its very easy to explain. The English are not having enough children, whereas non-whites have a high fertility rate. As the Observer said,

    This is the first time in history that a major indigenous population has voluntarily become a minority, rather than through war, famine or disease.

    Mind you, the English may be finished as a people, but at least they have twice as long to go than American whites do. By 2050 the whites will be a minority of the US population, as they already are in California. What amazes me is that two of the most powerful countries of the 19th and 20th centuries have legislated their way to their own extinction. Talk about the suicide of the West."

    On the 13th of August, 2002, The Daily Express reported thus:

    "Chemicals in every day use were yesterday shown for the first time to affect human fertility. A Dutch study will heighten fears that exposure to man-made pollution is behind testicular, prostate and breast cancer as well as the decline in sperm counts across the West. The World Health Organisation called for international research into the effects of gender bending chemicals on humans. And green group WWF warned:

    Chemicals that build up in our bodies threaten the next generation'."

    On the 16th of August, 2002, the BBC reported thus:

    "A clinic in the United States says it has applied for a licence to export sperm to the UK. The New England Cryogenic Center in Boston wants to give UK couples access to sperm from American men to help them to have children…

    New England Cryogenic Center has applied for license with the Human Fertilisation Authority in the UK for permission to import bulk shipments of donor semen into the UK… NECC has partnered with the North East London Fertility Service in Essex, run by Dr Maxim Segal, to bring our specimens into the UK… Once we have been approved for

    bulk shipping of specimen, the majority of our over 120 donors will then become available to UK facilities that wish to expand on their very low amount of available.

    Dr Segal said he wanted to offer couples a greater choice when it comes to choosing sperm. This would include allowing couples to choose sperm from an ethnic minority donor if desired."

    Segal, who is Jewish, runs the NELFS with his Jewish wife Barbara.

    Dr. Robert Winston, the most high profile fertility specialist in the UK, is also Jewish. On the 4th of February, 2003, 73 British Parliamentarians signed the Early Day Motion: Humane Treatment for Migrants with HIV, introduced by the MP, Neil

    Gerrard, which said:

    "This House notes the recent upsurge in inflammatory media coverage depicting asylum seekers as disease carriers and terrorists, notes how damaging such reports can be to people who have come to this country, in search of a safe haven and freedom from political persecution but also have HIV; believes that such media attention only fuels racism and stigma which is wholly counterproductive to the necessity to treat such individuals with respect and compassion; and urges the Government not to succumb to this media pressure".

    Now, it seems to me that a politician whose first instinct would put the welfare of a would-be immigrant who is HIV-positive before any thought of the dire consequences that the importation of such diseases might have upon his constituents, poses an enormous threat to the wellbeing of those who elected him.

    The unthinking sympathies of such people place the health, happiness and, for that matter, the survival of the native born population at tremendous risk.

    If the British electorate would protect themselves and their children from the blinkered generosity of these politically correct bleeding hearts, such one-sided generosity should not be tolerated. The people of Britain should consider when, if ever, their politicians were as keen to act with such charity towards the British themselves.

The following MPs signed the above EDM:

    Neil Gerrard, Jenny Tonge, Andrew George, Martyn Smyth, Ronnie Campbell, Kevin McNamara, Paul Holmes, Lynne Jones, Terry Davis, Ann Cryer, Martin Caton, Glenda Jackson, Terry Lewis, Harold Best, Harry Barnes, Sylvia Hermon, Win Griffiths, Edward Davey, Vincent Cable, Alan Meale, Greg Pope, Paul Tyler, Karen Buck, Jim Dobbin, Simon Thomas, Helen Clark, Syd Rapson, Robert Wareing, Janet Dean, Chris Smith, Kelvin Hopkins, Betty Williams, Rudi Vis, Peter Bottomley, Andrew Dismore, Ian Gibson, Elfyn Llwyd, Paul Stinchcombe, Paul Daisley, (deceased) John Barrett, Desmond Turner, Tony Clarke, Roy Beggs, Julia Drown, David Hamilton, Nigel Jones, Jim Cousins, Rob Marris, Mohammad Sarwar, Norman Lamb, Doug Naysmith, Jeremy Corbyn, Michael Clapham; David Borrow; Sandra Gidley; Joan Ruddock; John McDonnell; Julie Morgan; Sue Doughty; John Robertson; Harry Cohen; Mike Wood; Gavin Strang; Paul Marsden; Patsy Calton; Nick Harvey; Chris McCafferty; Michael Moore; Andrew Stunell; Bill Etherington; Hywel Williams; Alan Simpson and David Lepper.

    At the time this EDM was signed, in some parts of sub-Saharan Africa, as many as 1 in 4 of all adults were infected with the AIDS virus.

    If the true extent of the sexual irresponsibility of the many black, African men, who have brought the AIDS virus with them into this country, were to become known, the stark culpability of those who signed the EDM above would be obvious.

    On the 6th of February, 2003, the BBC reported thus:

    "Men who are exposed to high levels of lead may be at increased risk of becoming infertile, a study suggests. Researchers in the United States have found evidence to suggest that lead can damage sperm.

    Many men, such as plumbers, painters and printers, are exposed to lead at work. High levels of lead are also associated with people who smoke, drink alcohol or fail to exercise. The findings come as a second study suggests men should not put off becoming a father. Researchers at the University of California Berkeley have found yet more evidence that men become less fertile with each passing year.

    In the first study, researchers examined the semen from the partners of 140 women undergoing their first IVF cycle. They found that high lead levels in semen were associated with low fertilisation rates.

    In further tests, they discovered that lead can prevent sperm from fertilising the egg. 'We have evidence that higher lead levels interfere both with the ability of the sperm to bind to the egg and with its ability to fertilise the egg,' said Dr Susan Benoff, one of the researchers.

    Interestingly, none of the men who took part in the study were exposed to lead at work… Almost a quarter of men with high lead levels smoked cigarettes or drank alcohol. However, high levels of lead in other men could not be attributed to these factors. Dr Benoff suggested a lack of exercise could be an alternative explanation. Levels of lead in the blood increase if people fail to exercise…

    In the second study, researchers found that the quality of a man's semen deteriorates with age. They also discovered that the male biological clock begins ticking when men are in their 20s…

    They tested sperm motility - its liveliness and direction of movement. They discovered that motility decreases by 0.7% each year. This means that the chances of sperm being clinically abnormal or unhealthy is 25% at 22 years of age. By 30 that figure jumps to 40%, rising to 60% at age 40. At the age of 60, 85% of sperm is clinically abnormal." On the 11th of June, 2003, the BBC reported thus:

    "The rise in sexually transmitted infections has reached crisis point, MPs have warned. A report by the influential

    Commons health committee has found the NHS is no longer able to cope with the record number of people with STIs. It has called for urgent government action to tackle what it describes as a public health crisis. The report reveals that the number of people being diagnosed with infections is continuing to rocket.

    One in 10 young people are now infected with chlamydia, which can cause infertility in women. Syphilis rates have jumped by 500% in the last six years, while gonorrhoea infections have doubled. More people are also being diagnosed with HIV than ever before. Around 6,500 people were told they had the disease last year.

    The report found that the NHS is failing to address or even recognise the problem. It says sexual health clinics are ill-equipped to cope and are turning away hundreds of patients each week… The report blamed a lack of political direction and under-funding over many

    years for the crisis…

    Many patients are forced to wait as long as six weeks before they are seen by specialists…

    Committee chairman and Labour MP David Hinchliffe insisted the situation had reached crisis point.

    'I do not use the word lightly, but during the course of the inquiry, it has become plain that with sexual health we are looking at a public health crisis'…

    Public Health Minister Hazel Blears said… the national strategy, published in 2001, would deliver improvements…

    'The NHS is working to reverse the upward trends in infections, tackling inequalities and modernising services.'…

    Liberal Democrat MP Sandra Gidley, who sits on the health committee, said: "Rates of sexually transmitted disease, including HIV/Aids, are astronomical'." On the 13th of October, 2003, the BBC reported thus:

    "Men who smoke marijuana frequently damage their fertility in several different ways, research suggests.

    Scientists at Buffalo University found regular smokers had significantly less seminal fluid, and a lower sperm count…

    Lead researcher Dr Lani Burkman said:

    'The bottom line is, the active ingredients in marijuana are doing something to sperm'…

    Dr Burkman conceded that many men who smoke marijuana have fathered children. However, she said that smoking the drug may tip the balance against men whose fertility was borderline to start with…

    'I definitely would advise anyone trying to conceive not to smoke marijuana, and that would include women as well as men'."

    And yet, in the same month as this story appeared on the BBC website, a bill was

    placed before parliament seeking to downgrade the illegality of this drug.

    This in the knowledge that cannabis has many other negative side-affects as well. 318 MPs voted to downgrade it, 162 voted not to.

    On the 21st of June, 2005, The Independent reported thus:

    "Britain is facing an infertility crisis, with the number of couples who experience problems conceiving expected to double within the next 10 years.

    A leading fertility expert warned yesterday that, by 2015, one in three couples may need IVF treatment or similar fertility procedures. The low success rates of such treatments means soaring numbers will be left childless. Professor Bill Ledger predicted a looming 'infertility timebomb', with thousands of couples forced to go through physically and mentally draining treatment, at a cost of millions of pounds to the NHS each year. He blamed the soaring rates of fertility problems on modern lifestyle factors such as obesity, women delaying starting a family, falling sperm counts among men and rising rates of sexually transmitted infections, particularly chlamydia. Smoking is also a main factor in infertility in men and women. Professor Ledger, of the University of Sheffield, called for the Government to recognise infertility as a 'disease'.

    One in seven couples has problems conceiving, but Professor Ledger believes that will rise…

    Britains level of obesity, particularly among young girls, is becoming an increasing cause for concern. Figures show 13.7 per cent of all two to 10-year-olds are defined as clinically obese, rising to 16.5 per cent of children aged eight to 10.

    Women who are extremely overweight have trouble ovulating and are less likely to conceive naturally. Women who are overweight are also at increased risk of polycystic ovary syndrome, another cause of infertility.

    The sexually-transmitted infection chlamydia is also one of the leading causes of infertility among young women and has seen increases in recent years.

    One in eight men and one in 10 women in the UK has the infection, which shows no symptoms so many people have no idea that they are infected. Professor Ledger said: 'There will be a 10-year time lag in some of these factors because women who have chlamydia do not even know they have it until they come to have childrenthere is your

    time-bomb straight away.'

    He also pointed to a general and long-term decline in male fertility, at the same time as many women are delaying motherhood until their late 30s or early 40s. He criticised workplace policies which, he said, made it hard for younger women to make the decision to have children at a younger age.

    'If we prevent women having children early because we make it so difficult for them to take a break from their careers, we are making a rod for our own backs… To let women

    come out of work for a year or so and have their children properly looked after is part of a civilised society that I think we should aspire to'."

    That last sentence was a tremendously sensible one.

    If we British don't want to die out as a species we should be doing everything in our power to encourage responsible, young motherhood. There's nothing to stop women hitting the workplace when they've done procreating, for goodness sake! How does this sound?

    Have your three kids in your late teens and early twenties and the government will not only make sure that you and yours are well looked after, but we'll help you study for the University degree of your choice, whilst you're bringing up baby, and entrance to University will be a given, once your children are weaned.

It's what you call common sense.

Which was swapped for political correctness about forty years ago.

Who thinks that those who did the swapping should be boiled?

Thought so.

On the 22nd of April, 2003, The Daily Mail reported thus:

Report this document

For any questions or suggestions please email