DOC

Best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs), their standard errors (S

By Rita Brown,2014-04-18 01:00
6 views 0
Best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs), their standard errors (S

    Best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs), their standard errors (S.E.), confidence intervals (C.I.), tBLUPs, genotype scores, and family ranks for soluble solids content (SSC) in 81 melon (Cucumis melo L.) recombinant inbred lines (RIL) derived from a cross between USDA 846-1 (P) and “Top Mark” (P) 12tested at El Centro, California in 2004. 1 1 23 Entry BLUP S.E. C.I. lower C.I. upper tBLUP Score Rank RIL-5 10.47 0.44 9.60 11.33 -1.60 0 60 RIL-7 9.80 0.44 8.93 10.67 -3.10 -1 73 RIL-8 13.10 0.44 12.24 13.97 4.39 1 2 RIL-9 8.15 0.44 7.29 9.02 -6.86 -1 77 RIL-11 12.96 0.44 12.10 13.82 4.06 1 3 RIL-12 10.87 0.44 10.00 11.74 -0.69 0 47 RIL-18 10.52 0.44 9.66 11.38 -1.48 0 58 RIL-23 9.84 0.44 8.97 10.70 -3.03 -1 72 RIL-24 10.57 0.44 9.70 11.44 -1.36 0 57 RIL-26 12.10 0.44 11.24 12.97 2.12 1 14 RIL-28 11.54 0.44 10.67 12.41 0.83 0 26 RIL-29 12.03 0.44 11.17 12.90 1.96 1 15 RIL-32 10.74 0.44 9.88 11.60 -0.98 0 50 RIL-33 11.71 0.44 10.84 12.57 1.22 0 24 RIL-35 13.27 0.44 12.40 14.13 4.76 1 1 RIL-36 12.84 0.44 11.98 13.71 3.80 1 5 RIL-37 12.18 0.44 11.32 13.05 2.30 1 12 RIL-41 10.61 0.44 9.74 11.47 -1.28 0 55 RIL-45 9.87 0.44 9.01 10.73 -2.96 -1 70 RIL-47 12.59 0.44 11.72 13.45 3.22 1 7 RIL-49 10.30 0.44 9.44 11.17 -1.97 -1 66 RIL-50 10.52 0.44 9.65 11.38 -1.49 0 59 RIL-51 12.70 0.44 11.84 13.56 3.48 1 6 RIL-54 12.52 0.44 11.66 13.38 3.07 1 9 RIL-57 12.03 0.44 11.17 12.90 1.96 1 16 RIL-58 11.43 0.44 10.57 12.30 0.60 0 30 RIL-62 11.36 0.44 10.50 12.23 0.43 0 33 RIL-63 11.04 0.44 10.18 11.90 -0.29 0 41 RIL-64 10.67 0.44 9.81 11.54 -1.13 0 54 RIL-66 10.34 0.44 9.48 11.20 -1.88 -1 64 RIL-67 9.90 0.44 9.04 10.77 -2.88 -1 69 RIL-74 10.70 0.44 9.83 11.56 -1.08 0 51 RIL-75 9.78 0.44 8.91 10.65 -3.14 -1 74 RIL-80 11.39 0.44 10.52 12.25 0.49 0 32 RIL-81 11.85 0.44 10.99 12.71 1.55 0 20 RIL-83 11.98 0.44 11.12 12.84 1.84 1 17 RIL-85 11.87 0.44 11.01 12.74 1.60 0 19 RIL-86 11.77 0.45 10.89 12.64 1.33 0 22 RIL-87 11.29 0.44 10.43 12.15 0.27 0 35 RIL-89 10.69 0.44 9.82 11.56 -1.09 0 52 RIL-94 11.28 0.44 10.41 12.14 0.24 0 36

    RIL-96 11.00 0.44 10.14 11.87 -0.38 0 44 RIL-100 10.94 0.44 10.08 11.81 -0.51 0 46 RIL-104 11.74 0.44 10.87 12.60 1.28 0 23 RIL-105 11.12 0.44 10.26 11.98 -0.12 0 39 RIL-110 10.38 0.44 9.52 11.24 -1.79 -1 63 RIL-111 10.59 0.44 9.72 11.45 -1.33 0 56 RIL-113 11.42 0.44 10.56 12.29 0.57 0 31 RIL-115 10.27 0.44 9.41 11.13 -2.04 -1 67 RIL-121 9.94 0.44 9.08 10.81 -2.79 -1 68 RIL-122 9.85 0.45 8.98 10.73 -2.95 -1 71 RIL-124 11.01 0.44 10.14 11.87 -0.37 0 43 RIL-135 10.96 0.44 10.09 11.82 -0.49 0 45 RIL-137 12.30 0.44 11.44 13.16 2.56 1 11 RIL-139 11.10 0.44 10.24 11.96 -0.16 0 40 RIL-141 11.59 0.44 10.72 12.46 0.95 0 25 RIL-142 11.83 0.44 10.96 12.69 1.49 0 21 RIL-144 12.89 0.44 12.03 13.76 3.92 1 4 RIL-145 11.45 0.44 10.59 12.31 0.64 0 29 RIL-146 10.68 0.44 9.81 11.54 -1.13 0 53 RIL-147 11.13 0.44 10.27 11.99 -0.09 0 38 RIL-148 11.47 0.44 10.60 12.34 0.68 0 28 RIL-149 11.35 0.44 10.49 12.21 0.41 0 34 RIL-150 10.33 0.44 9.46 11.19 -1.91 -1 65 RIL-153 11.13 0.44 10.27 12.00 -0.08 0 37 RIL-154 12.16 0.44 11.29 13.02 2.24 1 13 RIL-156 10.80 0.44 9.94 11.66 -0.84 0 48 RIL-157 11.02 0.44 10.15 11.88 -0.35 0 42 RIL-160 10.75 0.44 9.88 11.61 -0.96 0 49 RIL-161 9.24 0.44 8.37 10.10 -4.40 -1 76 RIL-165 11.49 0.45 10.62 12.36 0.72 0 27 RIL-166 9.28 0.45 8.40 10.15 -4.24 -1 75 RIL-168 12.56 0.44 11.70 13.42 3.16 1 8 RIL-169 10.46 0.44 9.60 11.32 -1.61 0 61 RIL-171 12.40 0.44 11.54 13.27 2.80 1 10 RIL-173 11.90 0.44 11.04 12.77 1.67 1 18 RIL-174 10.42 0.44 9.56 11.29 -1.70 -1 62

     Population 11.17 0.16 10.45 11.88 66.86 1 The BLUP of a trait is the predicted value of a genotype (i.e., RIL-x) relative to population BLUP (;), and the t-statistic of a iBLUP (i.e., tBLUP) tests whether the BLUP is significantly different than ; (Ho RIL-x? ;). 1i 2 Genotypic score 1, 0, and 1 = superior (tBLUP ? 1.67), intermediate (-1.67 < tBLUP < 1.67), and inferior (tBLUP ? -1.67) performance at the 0.05 probability level, respectively. 3 RIL ranked according to their BLUPs from highest performing family to the lowest performing.

    Best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs), their standard errors (S.E.), confidence intervals (C.I.), tBLUPs, genotype scores, and family ranks for soluble solids content (SSC) in 81 melon (Cucumis melo L.) recombinant inbred lines (RIL) derived from a cross between USDA 846-1 (P) and “Top Mark” (P) 12tested at Hancock, Wisconsin in 2004. 1 1 23 Entry BLUP S.E. C.I. lower C.I. upper tBLUP Score Rank RIL-5 9.30 0.62 8.09 10.50 -1.52 0 64 RIL-7 7.69 0.64 6.43 8.94 -3.99 -1 76 RIL-8 12.07 0.63 10.84 13.29 2.93 1 8 RIL-9 7.45 0.63 6.20 8.69 -4.39 -1 77 RIL-11 11.86 0.62 10.65 13.07 2.64 1 10 RIL-12 10.23 1.43 7.44 13.03 0.00 0 36 RIL-18 9.97 0.63 8.73 11.20 -0.42 0 42 RIL-23 9.84 0.62 8.63 11.06 -0.64 0 46 RIL-24 10.51 0.62 9.30 11.71 0.44 0 34 RIL-26 9.38 0.62 8.17 10.59 -1.39 0 57 RIL-28 10.04 0.62 8.83 11.25 -0.32 0 41 RIL-29 10.51 0.73 9.08 11.94 0.38 0 33 RIL-32 9.50 0.62 8.29 10.72 -1.18 0 52 RIL-33 11.03 0.70 9.66 12.39 1.14 0 20 RIL-35 12.11 0.63 10.87 13.35 2.96 1 7 RIL-36 11.75 0.62 10.54 12.96 2.45 1 12 RIL-37 11.40 0.72 9.99 12.81 1.62 0 15 RIL-41 9.88 0.65 8.60 11.15 -0.55 0 45 RIL-45 9.48 0.62 8.27 10.69 -1.23 0 54 RIL-47 11.83 0.63 10.59 13.08 2.52 1 11 RIL-49 9.89 0.63 8.67 11.12 -0.55 0 44 RIL-50 8.61 0.62 7.40 9.83 -2.62 -1 72 RIL-51 9.45 0.66 8.16 10.73 -1.20 0 56 RIL-54 11.56 0.62 10.35 12.77 2.15 1 13 RIL-57 8.83 1.02 6.84 10.83 -1.38 -1 67 RIL-58 10.78 0.62 9.57 11.99 0.89 0 26 RIL-62 12.83 0.62 11.61 14.04 4.19 1 1 RIL-63 9.30 0.62 8.08 10.51 -1.51 -1 63 RIL-64 11.26 0.74 9.82 12.70 1.39 0 16 RIL-66 10.79 0.62 9.58 12.01 0.90 0 25 RIL-67 8.63 0.62 7.42 9.83 -2.62 -1 71 RIL-74 11.18 0.62 9.96 12.39 1.52 0 19 RIL-75 10.70 0.62 9.48 11.91 0.75 0 27 RIL-80 10.57 0.74 9.11 12.03 0.45 0 31 RIL-81 10.05 0.63 8.82 11.28 -0.30 0 39 RIL-83 12.47 0.62 11.27 13.68 3.64 1 4 RIL-85 12.75 0.64 11.49 14.01 3.91 1 2 RIL-86 12.27 0.63 11.04 13.49 3.25 1 6 RIL-87 10.05 0.62 8.83 11.26 -0.30 0 40 RIL-89 8.76 0.78 7.23 10.29 -1.90 -1 68 RIL-94 9.64 0.63 8.41 10.87 -0.95 0 51

    RIL-96 10.90 0.62 9.69 12.10 1.08 0 22 RIL-100 10.65 0.63 9.42 11.89 0.66 0 30 RIL-104 8.72 0.62 7.50 9.93 -2.45 -1 70 RIL-105 10.23 1.43 7.44 13.03 0.00 0 37 RIL-110 9.65 0.62 8.44 10.86 -0.95 0 50 RIL-111 9.35 0.73 7.92 10.78 -1.22 0 58 RIL-113 12.52 0.62 11.31 13.73 3.72 1 3 RIL-115 9.31 0.68 7.97 10.64 -1.37 0 62 RIL-121 9.34 0.63 8.10 10.57 -1.42 0 59 RIL-122 10.23 1.43 7.44 13.03 0.00 0 38 RIL-124 10.54 0.62 9.34 11.75 0.50 0 32 RIL-135 9.76 0.62 8.55 10.96 -0.78 0 48 RIL-137 10.80 0.63 9.57 12.02 0.90 0 24 RIL-139 11.22 0.62 9.99 12.44 1.58 0 18 RIL-141 10.50 0.63 9.26 11.73 0.42 0 35 RIL-142 12.03 0.63 10.79 13.27 2.83 1 9 RIL-144 11.25 0.62 10.04 12.46 1.65 0 17 RIL-145 9.67 0.62 8.45 10.88 -0.91 0 49 RIL-146 9.06 0.80 7.50 10.63 -1.47 0 66 RIL-147 11.42 0.62 10.21 12.63 1.93 1 14 RIL-148 7.83 0.62 6.62 9.04 -3.91 -1 75 RIL-149 9.14 0.71 7.75 10.54 -1.54 0 65 RIL-150 11.00 0.62 9.79 12.21 1.24 0 21 RIL-153 9.31 0.62 8.10 10.52 -1.51 0 61 RIL-154 10.69 0.66 9.39 11.99 0.68 0 28 RIL-156 8.20 0.62 7.00 9.41 -3.30 -1 73 RIL-157 9.31 0.63 8.07 10.56 -1.45 0 60 RIL-160 8.73 0.63 7.51 9.96 -2.40 -1 69 RIL-161 9.82 0.66 8.53 11.10 -0.64 0 47 RIL-165 12.38 0.62 11.16 13.59 3.46 1 5 RIL-166 9.50 0.65 8.22 10.77 -1.13 0 53 RIL-168 7.97 0.62 6.76 9.18 -3.68 -1 74 RIL-169 10.66 0.62 9.44 11.88 0.68 0 29 RIL-171 10.80 0.64 9.55 12.05 0.89 0 23 RIL-173 9.96 0.63 8.72 11.20 -0.43 0 43 RIL-174 9.46 0.66 8.17 10.75 -1.18 0 55

     Population 10.23 0.18 9.65 10.82 55.36 1 The BLUP of a trait is the predicted value of a genotype (i.e., RIL-x) relative to population BLUP (;), and the t-statistic of a iBLUP (i.e., tBLUP) tests whether the BLUP is significantly different than ; (Ho RIL-x? ;). i 2 Genotypic score 1, 0, and 1 = superior (tBLUP ? 1.67), intermediate (-1.67 < tBLUP < 1.67), and inferior (tBLUP ? -1.67) performance at the 0.05 probability level, respectively. 3 RIL ranked according to their BLUPs from highest performing family to the lowest performing.

    Best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs), their standard errors (S.E.), confidence intervals (C.I.), tBLUPs, genotype scores, and family ranks for measurements of mesocarp pressure (MP) in 81 melon (Cucumis melo L.) recombinant inbred lines (RIL) derived from a cross between USDA 846-1 (P) and “Top Mark” 1(P) tested at El Centro, California in 2004. 21 1 23 Entry BLUP S.E. C.I. lower C.I. upper tBLUP Score Rank RIL-5 2.26 0.258 1.75 2.77 -2.25 -1 62 RIL-7 2.55 0.258 2.04 3.06 -1.13 0 49 RIL-8 2.70 0.258 2.19 3.20 -0.55 0 41 RIL-9 3.50 0.258 3.00 4.01 2.57 1 12 RIL-11 2.45 0.258 1.95 2.96 -1.5 0 54 RIL-12 1.95 0.259 1.44 2.45 -3.45 -1 75 RIL-18 2.63 0.258 2.13 3.14 -0.81 0 45 RIL-23 2.78 0.258 2.28 3.29 -0.22 0 37 RIL-24 1.50 0.259 1.00 2.01 -5.16 -1 77 RIL-26 2.12 0.258 1.61 2.62 -2.8 -1 70 RIL-28 2.84 0.258 2.34 3.35 0.01 0 36 RIL-29 2.20 0.258 1.69 2.70 -2.49 -1 66 RIL-32 3.19 0.258 2.69 3.70 1.37 0 26 RIL-33 2.57 0.258 2.07 3.08 -1.03 0 48 RIL-35 2.11 0.258 1.60 2.61 -2.84 -1 71 RIL-36 2.13 0.258 1.63 2.64 -2.74 -1 69 RIL-37 3.28 0.258 2.78 3.79 1.72 1 20 RIL-41 2.60 0.258 2.10 3.11 -0.91 0 47 RIL-45 2.44 0.258 1.94 2.95 -1.54 0 55 RIL-47 2.78 0.258 2.27 3.28 -0.24 0 39 RIL-49 3.83 0.258 3.32 4.33 3.83 1 4 RIL-50 3.62 0.258 3.12 4.13 3.03 1 10 RIL-51 3.65 0.258 3.15 4.16 3.16 1 8 RIL-54 3.17 0.258 2.66 3.67 1.27 0 29 RIL-57 2.64 0.258 2.13 3.15 -0.78 0 43 RIL-58 2.20 0.258 1.69 2.70 -2.49 -1 67 RIL-62 2.35 0.2584 1.84 2.85 -1.91 -1 56 RIL-63 3.25 0.2576 2.74 3.75 1.57 0 23 RIL-64 2.30 0.258 1.80 2.81 -2.08 -1 60 RIL-66 3.26 0.258 2.76 3.77 1.64 0 21 RIL-67 2.95 0.258 2.45 3.46 0.43 0 32 RIL-74 2.24 0.258 1.74 2.75 -2.31 -1 64 RIL-75 3.62 0.259 3.11 4.12 2.99 1 11 RIL-80 3.65 0.258 3.14 4.15 3.13 1 9 RIL-81 2.50 0.258 1.99 3.00 -1.34 0 52 RIL-83 2.07 0.258 1.57 2.58 -2.97 -1 72 RIL-85 2.32 0.258 1.81 2.82 -2.02 -1 59 RIL-86 2.50 0.2599 1.99 3.01 -1.3 0 51 RIL-87 2.23 0.258 1.72 2.73 -2.38 -1 65 RIL-89 1.63 0.2625 1.12 2.15 -4.6 -1 76 RIL-94 2.78 0.258 2.28 3.29 -0.22 0 38

    RIL-96 2.66 0.258 2.15 3.17 -0.7 0 42 RIL-100 3.43 0.258 2.92 3.94 2.29 1 13 RIL-104 3.25 0.258 2.75 3.76 1.6 0 22 RIL-105 2.73 0.258 2.22 3.23 -0.43 0 40 RIL-110 3.05 0.258 2.55 3.56 0.83 0 31 RIL-111 2.47 0.258 1.96 2.98 -1.44 -1 53 RIL-113 2.54 0.259 2.03 3.05 -1.15 0 50 RIL-115 3.42 0.259 2.91 3.92 2.22 1 15 RIL-121 3.39 0.258 2.88 3.90 2.13 1 16 RIL-122 1.96 0.2599 1.45 2.47 -3.37 -1 74 RIL-124 2.18 0.258 1.67 2.68 -2.57 -1 68 RIL-135 3.14 0.258 2.63 3.64 1.15 0 30 RIL-137 4.10 0.258 3.60 4.61 4.9 1 2 RIL-139 3.42 0.258 2.91 3.92 2.23 1 14 RIL-141 3.34 0.259 2.84 3.85 1.94 1 18 RIL-142 3.32 0.258 2.81 3.82 1.84 1 19 RIL-144 2.86 0.258 2.36 3.37 0.08 0 35 RIL-145 3.73 0.258 3.23 4.24 3.45 1 7 RIL-146 2.64 0.258 2.13 3.14 -0.79 0 44 RIL-147 3.18 0.258 2.67 3.68 1.31 0 28 RIL-148 3.80 0.259 3.30 4.31 3.73 1 5 RIL-149 2.32 0.258 1.81 2.83 -2.02 -1 58 RIL-150 2.95 0.258 2.44 3.45 0.41 0 33 RIL-153 3.35 0.258 2.84 3.85 1.97 1 17 RIL-154 2.07 0.258 1.56 2.58 -2.98 -1 73 RIL-156 3.19 0.258 2.68 3.70 1.35 0 27 RIL-157 3.98 0.258 3.47 4.48 4.4 1 3 RIL-160 2.28 0.258 1.77 2.78 -2.18 -1 61 RIL-161 4.31 0.258 3.80 4.81 5.69 1 1 RIL-165 2.61 0.259 2.10 3.12 -0.89 0 46 RIL-166 3.77 0.2599 3.26 4.28 3.57 1 6 RIL-168 2.87 0.258 2.36 3.37 0.1 0 34 RIL-169 2.25 0.258 1.75 2.76 -2.28 -1 63 RIL-171 3.21 0.258 2.71 3.72 1.44 0 25 RIL-173 2.34 0.258 1.83 2.84 -1.96 -1 57 RIL-174 3.23 0.258 2.73 3.74 1.52 0 24 Population 2.84 0.081 2.49 3.19 35 1 The BLUP of a trait is the predicted value of a genotype (i.e., RIL-x) relative to population BLUP (;), and the t-statistic of a iBLUP (i.e., tBLUP) tests whether the BLUP is significantly different than ; (Ho RIL-x? ;). i 2 Genotypic score 1, 0, and 1 = superior (tBLUP ? 1.67), intermediate (-1.67 < tBLUP < 1.67), and inferior (tBLUP ? -1.67) performance at the 0.05 probability level, respectively. 3 RIL ranked according to their BLUPs from highest performing family to the lowest performing.

    Best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs), their standard errors (S.E.), confidence intervals (C.I.), tBLUPs, genotype scores, and family ranks for of mesocarp pressure (MP) measurements in 81 melon (Cucumis melo L.) recombinant inbred lines (RIL) derived from a cross between USDA 846-1 (P) and “Top Mark” 1(P) tested at Hancock, Wisconsin in 2004. 21 1 23 Entry BLUP S.E. C.I. lower C.I. upper tBLUP Score Rank RIL-5 3.88 0.66 2.59 5.16 -2.25 -1 64 RIL-7 3.55 0.67 2.24 4.87 -2.68 -1 66 RIL-8 4.11 0.66 2.82 5.39 -1.90 -1 56 RIL-9 4.54 0.67 3.23 5.86 -1.21 0 49 RIL-11 7.92 0.66 6.63 9.20 3.91 1 7 RIL-12 5.35 1.83 1.77 8.94 0.00 0 37 RIL-18 6.58 0.67 5.27 7.88 1.84 1 21 RIL-23 4.75 0.66 3.46 6.04 -0.92 0 44 RIL-24 4.20 0.66 2.92 5.49 -1.76 -1 54 RIL-26 6.74 0.66 5.46 8.03 2.12 1 17 RIL-28 5.58 0.66 4.29 6.86 0.34 0 34 RIL-29 4.26 0.74 2.81 5.71 -1.49 0 52 RIL-32 5.63 0.66 4.34 6.93 0.43 0 33 RIL-33 3.93 0.74 2.48 5.38 -1.92 -1 61 RIL-35 3.58 0.67 2.27 4.89 -2.65 -1 65 RIL-36 3.48 0.66 2.19 4.77 -2.85 -1 67 RIL-37 2.75 0.76 1.27 4.24 -3.44 -1 75 RIL-41 3.32 0.68 1.99 4.65 -3.00 -1 69 RIL-45 5.70 0.66 4.41 6.98 0.52 0 31 RIL-47 6.95 0.67 5.64 8.26 2.38 1 15 RIL-49 4.30 0.66 3.00 5.60 -1.59 0 51 RIL-50 8.00 0.66 6.71 9.29 4.02 1 5 RIL-51 7.38 0.69 6.04 8.73 2.95 1 12 RIL-54 7.39 0.66 6.10 8.67 3.10 1 11 RIL-57 2.85 1.12 0.65 5.05 -2.23 -1 73 RIL-58 5.69 0.66 4.41 6.98 0.52 0 32 RIL-62 3.07 0.66 1.77 4.36 -3.48 -1 71 RIL-63 6.56 0.66 5.28 7.85 1.84 1 22 RIL-64 5.83 0.77 4.32 7.34 0.62 0 30 RIL-66 4.31 0.66 3.02 5.60 -1.59 0 50 RIL-67 7.15 0.66 5.86 8.43 2.73 1 13 RIL-74 4.95 0.66 3.66 6.24 -0.61 0 42 RIL-75 8.81 0.66 7.52 10.10 5.24 1 1 RIL-80 2.83 0.83 1.20 4.46 -3.03 -1 74 RIL-81 3.92 0.66 2.62 5.22 -2.17 -1 63 RIL-83 3.33 0.66 2.05 4.62 -3.08 -1 68 RIL-85 4.06 0.67 2.74 5.38 -1.92 -1 57 RIL-86 4.20 0.66 2.90 5.50 -1.74 -1 55 RIL-87 6.11 0.66 4.81 7.40 1.14 0 28 RIL-89 2.44 0.80 0.86 4.02 -3.62 -1 77 RIL-94 3.93 0.66 2.63 5.22 -2.16 -1 62

    RIL-96 5.00 0.66 3.71 6.28 -0.54 0 41 RIL-100 7.86 0.67 6.55 9.16 3.76 1 9 RIL-104 6.34 0.66 5.05 7.63 1.50 0 26 RIL-105 5.35 1.83 1.77 8.94 0.00 0 38 RIL-110 6.73 0.66 5.44 8.01 2.10 1 19 RIL-111 4.72 0.74 3.27 6.17 -0.86 0 45 RIL-113 4.57 0.66 3.29 5.86 -1.19 0 47 RIL-115 7.05 0.70 5.67 8.43 2.41 1 14 RIL-121 7.98 0.67 6.67 9.28 3.94 1 6 RIL-122 5.35 1.83 1.77 8.94 0.00 0 39 RIL-124 6.08 0.66 4.79 7.37 1.11 0 29 RIL-135 6.47 0.66 5.18 7.75 1.70 1 24 RIL-137 5.41 0.66 4.11 6.70 0.08 0 36 RIL-139 6.74 0.66 5.45 8.03 2.11 1 18 RIL-141 5.44 0.67 4.14 6.74 0.13 0 35 RIL-142 4.57 0.67 3.25 5.89 -1.17 0 48 RIL-144 4.25 0.66 2.96 5.54 -1.68 -1 53 RIL-145 8.24 0.66 6.95 9.53 4.38 1 4 RIL-146 2.67 0.86 0.98 4.36 -3.12 -1 76 RIL-147 6.16 0.66 4.88 7.45 1.23 0 27 RIL-148 8.28 0.66 7.00 9.57 4.47 1 3 RIL-149 2.96 0.75 1.49 4.43 -3.19 -1 72 RIL-150 6.93 0.66 5.64 8.21 2.40 1 16 RIL-153 7.77 0.66 6.48 9.05 3.68 1 10 RIL-154 3.93 0.69 2.58 5.29 -2.06 -1 60 RIL-156 7.87 0.66 6.59 9.16 3.84 1 8 RIL-157 8.66 0.67 7.35 9.97 4.94 1 2 RIL-160 6.37 0.66 5.07 7.67 1.53 0 25 RIL-161 4.59 0.68 3.25 5.93 -1.12 0 46 RIL-165 4.86 0.66 3.57 6.15 -0.75 0 43 RIL-166 6.64 0.68 5.30 7.98 1.88 1 20 RIL-168 6.47 0.66 5.19 7.76 1.70 1 23 RIL-169 3.94 0.66 2.65 5.24 -2.14 -1 58 RIL-171 3.94 0.67 2.62 5.25 -2.12 -1 59 RIL-173 5.05 0.67 3.74 6.36 -0.46 0 40 RIL-174 3.16 0.68 1.82 4.50 -3.21 -1 70

     Population 5.35 0.23 4.63 6.08 23.5 1 The BLUP of a trait is the predicted value of a genotype (i.e., RIL-x) relative to population BLUP (;), and the t-statistic of a iBLUP (i.e., tBLUP) tests whether the BLUP is significantly different than ; (Ho RIL-x? ;). i 2 Genotypic score 1, 0, and 1 = superior (tBLUP ? 1.67), intermediate (-1.67 < tBLUP < 1.67), and inferior (tBLUP ? -1.67) performance at the 0.05 probability level, respectively. 3 RIL ranked according to their BLUPs from highest performing family to the lowest performing.

    Best linear unbiased predictors (BLUPs), their standard errors (S.E.), confidence intervals (C.I.), tBLUPs, genotype scores, and family ranks for fruit diameter (FD) measurements in 81 melon (Cucumis melo L.) recombinant inbred lines (RIL) derived from a cross between USDA 846-1 (P) and “Top Mark” (P) 12tested at El Centro, California in 2004. 1 1 23 Entry BLUP S.E. C.I. lower C.I. upper tBLUP Score Rank RIL-5 12.33 0.427 11.50 13.17 0.94 0 29 RIL-7 12.00 0.427 11.16 12.83 0.15 0 35 RIL-8 9.97 0.427 9.14 10.81 -4.59 -1 76 RIL-9 10.44 0.427 9.60 11.28 -3.5 -1 70 RIL-11 13.87 0.427 13.03 14.71 4.52 1 4 RIL-12 11.79 0.429 10.95 12.63 -0.33 0 43 RIL-18 13.43 0.427 12.60 14.27 3.51 1 7 RIL-23 10.82 0.429 9.98 11.66 -2.6 -1 66 RIL-24 13.35 0.427 12.51 14.19 3.32 1 8 RIL-26 11.75 0.427 10.91 12.59 -0.43 0 48 RIL-28 12.93 0.427 12.09 13.77 2.34 1 10 RIL-29 12.49 0.427 11.66 13.33 1.31 0 26 RIL-32 12.32 0.427 11.48 13.16 0.9 0 30 RIL-33 11.83 0.427 10.99 12.67 -0.25 0 42 RIL-35 10.53 0.427 9.69 11.36 -3.29 -1 67 RIL-36 10.89 0.427 10.05 11.73 -2.44 -1 61 RIL-37 12.11 0.427 11.27 12.95 0.41 0 33 RIL-41 12.76 0.427 11.92 13.60 1.93 1 17 RIL-45 12.73 0.427 11.90 13.57 1.87 1 18 RIL-47 11.92 0.427 11.08 12.76 -0.03 0 38 RIL-49 12.61 0.427 11.77 13.45 1.59 0 23 RIL-50 12.70 0.427 11.86 13.53 1.78 1 21 RIL-51 11.36 0.427 10.53 12.20 -1.33 -1 53 RIL-54 12.76 0.427 11.93 13.60 1.94 1 16 RIL-57 11.55 0.427 10.72 12.39 -0.89 0 50 RIL-58 12.71 0.429 11.86 13.55 1.8 1 20 RIL-62 10.18 0.426 9.34 11.01 -4.13 -1 73 RIL-63 12.82 0.427 11.98 13.66 2.07 1 14 RIL-64 10.07 0.427 9.23 10.91 -4.37 -1 75 RIL-66 11.23 0.427 10.40 12.07 -1.64 0 55 RIL-67 12.38 0.427 11.54 13.21 1.03 0 28 RIL-74 12.93 0.429 12.08 13.77 2.31 1 11 RIL-75 10.86 0.427 10.03 11.70 -2.51 -1 63 RIL-80 13.19 0.427 12.35 14.03 2.94 1 9 RIL-81 11.85 0.427 11.02 12.69 -0.19 0 40 RIL-83 11.94 0.427 11.10 12.78 0.01 0 37 RIL-85 13.79 0.431 12.94 14.63 4.31 1 5 RIL-86 12.56 0.427 11.72 13.40 1.46 0 25 RIL-87 12.78 0.429 11.94 13.63 1.98 1 15 RIL-89 11.26 0.427 10.42 12.09 -1.59 0 54 RIL-94 12.15 0.427 11.31 12.99 0.5 0 32

    RIL-96 12.83 0.427 11.99 13.67 2.1 1 13 RIL-100 9.54 0.427 8.71 10.38 -5.59 -1 77 RIL-104 11.78 0.427 10.94 12.62 -0.36 0 44 RIL-105 14.95 0.427 14.11 15.78 7.05 1 1 RIL-110 11.78 0.427 10.94 12.62 -0.37 0 45 RIL-111 11.74 0.429 10.90 12.58 -0.45 0 49 RIL-113 11.90 0.427 11.06 12.73 -0.09 0 39 RIL-115 10.16 0.427 9.33 11.00 -4.14 -1 74 RIL-121 10.51 0.431 9.66 11.35 -3.31 -1 68 RIL-122 10.87 0.427 10.03 11.71 -2.49 -1 62 RIL-124 11.44 0.427 10.60 12.27 -1.16 0 52 RIL-135 11.12 0.427 10.29 11.96 -1.89 -1 58 RIL-137 11.51 0.427 10.67 12.35 -1 0 51 RIL-139 12.60 0.429 11.76 13.44 1.56 0 24 RIL-141 10.83 0.427 9.99 11.67 -2.58 -1 65 RIL-142 10.85 0.427 10.02 11.69 -2.52 -1 64 RIL-144 11.20 0.427 10.36 12.04 -1.72 -1 57 RIL-145 12.89 0.427 12.05 13.72 2.23 1 12 RIL-146 10.45 0.427 9.62 11.29 -3.46 -1 69 RIL-147 14.29 0.429 13.45 15.13 5.5 1 3 RIL-148 10.93 0.427 10.10 11.77 -2.34 -1 60 RIL-149 14.72 0.427 13.88 15.56 6.53 1 2 RIL-150 11.76 0.427 10.93 12.60 -0.4 0 47 RIL-153 12.22 0.427 11.38 13.05 0.66 0 31 RIL-154 12.07 0.427 11.23 12.91 0.32 0 34 RIL-156 10.24 0.427 9.40 11.07 -3.97 -1 72 RIL-157 11.84 0.427 11.01 12.68 -0.21 0 41 RIL-160 11.20 0.427 10.37 12.04 -1.71 -1 56 RIL-161 11.77 0.429 10.93 12.61 -0.38 0 46 RIL-165 10.33 0.431 9.48 11.17 -3.73 -1 71 RIL-166 12.67 0.427 11.83 13.50 1.71 1 22 RIL-168 13.77 0.427 12.93 14.61 4.3 1 6 RIL-169 10.97 0.427 10.13 11.81 -2.25 -1 59 RIL-171 12.49 0.427 11.66 13.33 1.31 0 27 RIL-173 12.73 0.427 11.89 13.56 1.85 1 19 RIL-174 11.99 0.427 11.15 12.83 0.13 0 36

     Population 11.93 0.153 11.27 12.59 77.71 1 The BLUP of a trait is the predicted value of a genotype (i.e., RIL-x) relative to population BLUP (;), and the t-statistic of a iBLUP (i.e., tBLUP) tests whether the BLUP is significantly different than ; (Ho RIL-x? ;). i 2 Genotypic score 1, 0, and 1 = superior (tBLUP ? 1.67), intermediate (-1.67 < tBLUP < 1.67), and inferior (tBLUP ? -1.67) performance at the 0.05 probability level, respectively. 3 RIL ranked according to their BLUPs from highest performing family to the lowest performing.

Report this document

For any questions or suggestions please email
cust-service@docsford.com