Study
;第9期
;2010年5月1O日
;计算机教育
;ComputerEducationNo.9May.10,201047
;文章编号:1672—5913(2010)09-0047—04中图分类号:G642文献标识码:A
;StudyontheQualityAssuranceandEvaluationMechanismin ;College—enterpriseCooperation
;LIULi—ping,CHENZhi—gang
;(SchoolofSoftware,CentralSouthUniversity,Changsha410075,China)
;Abstract:College.enterprisecooperationmodelisanewmodelofcultivatingapplication.typedtalentsi
ncollegeby
;cooperatingwithenterprises.Thisthesisputsforwardasetofqualityassuranceandevaluationmechanis
m,practice
;showsthatthismechanismCaneffectivelyguaranteetheteachingqualityandevaluatetheteachingresult
sscientifically.
;Keywords:college—enterprisecooperation;quality;evaluation;mechanism ;1Background
;College—enterprisecooperationmodelisanew
;modelofcultivatingapplication—typedtalentsin
;UniversitybyCooperatingwithEnterprises.Itsbasic ;connotationincludescollege-enterprisecooperation, ;two—Wayparticipationandmutualbenefits.
;InJuly2001,”Thenoticeonestablishingexemplary
;softwarecollegesissuedbytheMinistryofEducation’’
;pointedout:Facingthecriticalnationalindustrial ;developmentandfiercecompetitionfortalents,satisfying ;themarkets’needs,reformingsoftwaretalentstraining
;modeandemphasizingthesoftwaretalentstraininghas ;becomeanimportantandurgenttaskinthehigher ;educationreformanddevelopment.
;Nowadaysmanysoftwarecollegesinhighschools ;havelaunchedallal1.roundschool—enterprisecooperation,
;thismodelnotonlybringshigh-qualityschoolteacher ;resources,thecutting—edgeenterprisetechnology,
;engineeringmodel,innovativeideasandinnovative ;approaches,butalsotheenterprise’Shopeforeducation
;anddemandfortalents.
;However,intheprocessof
;cooperation,manyproblems
;appeared,suchashowto
;maintainthecomprehensive
;andadvancedattributesof
;theteachingcontent,howto
;guaranteetheteachingquality,
;andhowtoassessandevaluate
;theprocessandresultsof
;educationandSOon.
;LIULi—ping
;AsaNationalexemplarysoftwarecollege,the ;SoftwareCollegeinCentralSouthUniversityhasseta ;goalsinceitsestablishment:”Tocultivateinternational
;softwareengineeringeliteswithaninnovativesense”.
;Collegeactivelyadaptstotheneedsofeconomicand ;socialdevelopment,promotestheschoolinstitutional ;reform,deepencollege—enterprisecooperationand
;realizethegreat?leap?-forwarddevelopmentinsoftware ;talenttraining.
;Authorsintroduction:LIULi-ping(1971
一),female,seniorexperimenta1diviSion,researchdirecti013iSgrid
;computing,service—orientedcomputing;CHENZhi—gang(1964
一),male,Ph.D,professor,doctoraltutor,research ;directioniSnetworkcomputinganddiStributedtreatment. ;48
;计算机教育
;ComputerEducation2010
;Basedonthemutuallybeneficialandwin-win ;cooperationofstudents,enterprise,societyandschool, ;Collegehasintroducedtheindustry’stalentneeds,good
;humanresources,technicalresources,innovative ;approachesandoperatingmodetothetalenttraining ;process,andhascreatedanewtalenttrainingmodelfor ;college-enterprisecooperation.Collegehasalso ;developedandimplementedaseriesofscientificquality ;assurancemanagementsystem.Combinedwiththe ;CMM(CapabilityMaturityMode1)proposedbythe ;softwarecollegeinCarnegieMellonourcollegehas ;proposedCDIOCapabilityMaturityAssessmentModel ;CDIO.CMM【jJ.
;Fiveyearsofimplementationdemonstrates, ;CDIO—CMMnotonlyprovidesaunifiedassessment ;systemtoassessstudentsCDIOability,butalsohelps ;toimprovetheCDIOlearningprocess,thuscontributes
;totheimplementationoftheCDIOengineeringeducation ;modelandtheimprovementofthequalityofengineering ;education,andfinallyprovidesmoreandbetterengineering ;talentsforthesociety.
;2QualityAssurance
;enterpriseCooperation
;2.1Difie}rentWaysto
;andAdvancedAttributes
;MechanismsforCollege-
;MaintainComprehensive
;oftheTeachingContent
;Thecollegehasinvitedseniorexpertsinsoftware ;industryandenterprisestojointheCollegeTeaching ;Committee,participatingintheformulationoftalent ;trainingobjectivesandcurriculumsystems,determining ;thecoursesyllabus,carryingouttheteachingquality ;assessmentsandparticipatinginafacultydecision-making. ;Weestablishacollege—enterprisejointmeeting
;systemtoexplorethelatestprogressinthesubjectand ;industry,andthusadjusttotheteachingcontent. ;Wewritehigh—qualityteachingmaterialsbyway
;ofcollege-enterprisecooperation.Itisoftendifficultto ;findateachingmaterialthatmeetsthecourse’
;requirementsandobjectives.Therefore,withthe ;experienceinthepreparationofteachingmaterials,we ;havewrittensomebookstogetherwimtIleenterprise ;engineers.Thesebooksshouldfullyreflectandmeetthe ;course’requirementsandobjectives.
;Cooperatedwithmanyinternationa1anddomestic ;well?knowncompanies,Collegehasofferedrelated ;iointcoursesandachievedgoodresults.Thefrontier ;technology,engineeringmodelsandactualcasesfrom ;enterprisesstimulatetheclassroomteachingandthus ;aregenerallywelcomedbythestudents.
;2.2ScientificandStrictManagementSystemto ;EnsuretheTeachingNormalization
;Collegetreatsteachingseriously,organizesteaching ;processcarefully,andisalwaysstrictwithstudents.It ;putsthequalityoftalenttrainingasalifeline,and ;concentratesonenhancingtheawarenessofteaching ;quality.Targetedatvariousaspectsoftheteachingprocess, ;ourcollegehasimprovedthequalitycontrolsystemand ;establishedacomprehensiveeducationmanagementsystem. ;Weestablishthedual-tutorialsystemandenterprise
;visitingsystem.Undertheguidanceoftheenterprise ;projectmanagersandthecollegetutors,studentteams ;completepracticaltrainingprojectsaccordingtothe ;enterpriseprojectoperatingmodeandmeettheneedsof ;theenterprisepracticalproject.
;Weintroduceasetofassessment,evaluationand ;eliminationmechanismforteachersemployedfrom ;enterprises.Adoptingthemeansofformertrialteaching, ;lecturesattending,semesterclassevaluation,student ;evaluationandothermeanstoensuretheteachingquality. ;3EvaluationSystemforCollege—enterprise
;CooperationinTalentTraining
;Evaluationismainlytheassessmentandevaluation ;abouttheimplementationandresultsoftheeducation ;process.Itisthemostimportantmeansofmonitoring ;theteachingeffectsandteachingquality.
;Evaluationsystemincludestwoaspects:theevaluation ;ofstudentsandtheevaluationofthetrainingmode. ;第9期
LIULi—ping,etal:StudyontheQualityAssuranceandEvaluationMechanisminCollege—enterpriseCooperation49
;3.1CDIO-CMMBasedonStudentCapabilityMaturity ;Afternearlyfiveyearsofresearchandimplementation, ;combinedwiththeCMM(CapabilityMaturityMode1) ;proposedbythesoftwarecollegeinCarnegieMellon, ;ourcollegehasproposedCDIOCapabilityMaturity ;AssessmentModelCDIO—CMM.constructedCDIO
;CapabilityMaturityAssessment,andimproveditsbasic ;framework.CDIO—CMMnotonlyprovidesaunified
;assessmentsystemtoassessstudentsCDIOability,but ;alsohelpstoimprovetheCDIOlearningprocess,thus ;contributestotheimplementationoftheCDIOengineering ;educationmodelandtheimprovementofthequalityof ;engineeringeducation.
;WiththehelpoftheStudentCapabilityMaturity ;AssessmentModel,thecollegehasformedanall—round
;teachingqualityassuranceandmonitoringsystem. ;Collegehasestablishedqualitycontrolandimprovement ;mechanismwithcapacity—cultivatingasitscoreand
;basedonthefourlinksof”preparation,implementation,
;summary.feedback”.”Preparation”istodeterminethe
;scopeoftheassessmentprocess,theestablishmentof ;evaluationorganizations,thedevelopmentofassessment ;plans,andtodeterminethecontentofassessment.
;‘‘Implementation”includessampleselection,questionnaire
;surveysandevaluation,interviewsanddocument ;review,informationconfirmingandfiling.”Summary’’
;istosumupandanalyzethestrongandweakpoints, ;confirmassessmentleve1.communicatewimstudentsand ;createassessmentreport.’’Feedback’’includessuggestions
;fortheimprovementofstudentslearningprocess, ;teachingcontentandmethods,curriculumandcurriculum ;systemoptimization,teachingprogramadjustments. ;InthelightoftheStudentCapabilityMaturity
;AssessmentModel,collegehasadjustedtraining ;programsandcoursecontent,improvedthetraining ;process,andconstructedanevalu~ionsystemconformed ;tothe”pluralism,rationalizationandstandardization’’of
;theCDIOeducationalmodel[引.
;3.2EvaluationofStudents
;Accordingtothecharacteristicsofthesoftware ;coursesandtrainingprocess,collegeusesappropriate ;evaluationmethodsforstudentsOfdifferentcoursesand ;differentstages.Studentcapabilitymaturityassessment ;iscombinedwithcollegeassessmentandenterprise ;assessment.Collegeassessmentismadebycourse ;examination,theorytest,practicalabilityassessment, ;questionnairesurvey,lecturesattending,interviewsand ;visits,etc.Enterpriseassessmentfocusesonstudent ;abilitytosolvepracticalproblemsandtheoverall ;qualityassessment.Form1illustratesthecapacityofall ;gradesneedtobetested.
;FOrm1CapacityNeedtobeEvaluated
;GradeCapacityNeedtobeEvaluated
;Ideologicaleducation,foreignlanguageskills,mathematics,basicskills(1ogicalthinking,codingcapa
bility),personalF
;reshmen
;qualities(self-learningability,responsibility,communicationskills,abilitytoexecute),etc.
;Technicalskills(professionalknowledge,independentproblem—solvingskills,developmenttools,applicationcapability),S
;ophomore
;projectcapabilities,personalqualities(collaborationcapabilities,theteamability),etc.
;Projectmanagementcapabilities(engineeringanalysis,overalldesign,organization,implementationc
apacity),personalJ
;uniors
;qualities(passion,efficiency,integrity),etc. ;Technicalcapacity(high-endlarge—scalesoftwareproductdevelopment,platformarchitecture,thelat
estsoftwaretechnology,etc.),S
;eniorStudents
;personalqualities(self-confidence,self-expression,professional,corporateloyalty,internationalcoop
eration),innovation,etc
;Inthestudent
;assessmentaccounts
;abilityevaluation,thecollege
;f0r60%ofthetota1andthe
;enterpriseevaluationaccountsfor40%.Forthecollege ;assessment,theratioofthecourseexamination ;50
;计算机教育
;ComputerEducation2010
;performanceis50%,comparedto10%ofthetheoretical ;assessment,practicalabilityassessmentaccountsfor ;30%comparedto10%ofthequestionnairesurvey[6】.
;Throughacomprehensiveanalysisoftheabove ;evaluationresults,studentabilityevaluationreportcarl ;beformed.Evaluationreportreflectsthematuritylevel ;andexistingproblemsofthestudentsCDIOcapability, ;thusthedevelopmentprogramsforthenextstageand ;theCDIOprocessimprovementorientationCallbe ;adjustedaccordingly.
;Collegeorganizedevaluationin2006and2009. ;Fig.3isthecapacityevaluationscoresofallstudents ;in2006,Fig.4isthescoresofallstudentsin2009.By ;Fig.3CapacityEvaluationScoresofAllStudentsin2006 ;comparingFig.3andFig.4,wecanseetheabilityof ;allstudentsoftheCDIOgenerallybeimprovedafter ;threeyearsofCDIO—basedabilitytraining.
;Fig.4CapacityEvaluationScoresofAllStudentsin2009 ;4Conclusion
;Enhancingthecultivatingofstudent’sengineering
;capabilitiesiscriticalforthehigherengineering ;education.Toachieveafurthercooperationwithenterprises, ;improvethequalityoftalenttraining,softwarecollege ;inCentralSouthUniversityhasmadealotthorough ;studyandpractice,formeditsowncharacteristics,and ;obtainedgoodteachingresults.
;Refefences:
;[1]MinistryofEducationofthePeople’sRepublicofChina.TheNoticeonEstablishingNationalPilotSo
ftware
;EngineeringSchoo1s(EducationHigh【2001]No.3)【S】,2001.
;CarnegieMe1IonUniversitySoftwareEngineeringInstitute.Capabi1ityMaturityModel(C
?):SoftwareProcess
;ImprovementGuide[M】.LIUMeng—ren,trans1ation.Beijing:ElectronicIndustryPress,2001:30—36.
;CHENQ卜
yuan,RENSheng-bing,HUZhi—gang,eta1.CDIOEngineeringStudentsCapabi1ityMaturityAssessmentand
;ImprovementSystemforResearch[J].ChinaHigherEducation,2009(8):31—33.
;ZHAJJan—zhong.OnCDIOModelunder”LearningbyDoing”Strategy[J】.ResearchinHigherEduc
ationofEngineering,
;2008(3):卜6.
;TANChang—geng,RENSheng-bing,HUZhi—gang.SoftwareEngineeringCurticulumBasedontheStudentsCapabi1ity
;MaturityMode1【C】.Eangzhou:NationalSoftwareEngineeringConference2007,2007:187—190.
;HUZhi—gang,LIULi—ping,RENSheng-bing.ResearchonPipelineTrainingSystemBasedonCDIOCapacity
;Assessment[R].Nanjing:Nationa1SoltwareEngineeringConference2009,2009. ;(编辑:张现)团
;