DOC

5OptimisingContainerTransfersatMultimodalTerminals

By Douglas Hunt,2014-06-13 07:24
6 views 0
optimising container container of bordercontainer container.dataitem cookiecontainer splitcontainer tomcat container itemcontainerstyle ext.container

    Unit 5

    1.1 Text

    Optimising Container Transfers at Multimodal Terminals

    The seaport terminals have changed dramatically after the introduction of containerization. These changes include alterations to the storage area the

    introduction of specialised container handling equipment and storage methods (stacking abilities). The role of a multimodal container terminal (MCT) is to ensure a smooth transfer of freight between the two modes. Such freight may be in containers

    flat trayspiggyback (trailer on flat wagon)or roadrailers (trailers capable of

    road and rail movement without requiring rail wagons). The main factors influencing terminal operating performance are as follows. Operating strategies; physical layout ship and train plans; management/ work practice; ship and train reliability; pick-up-delivery cycle times; lifting equipment and customer requirements. Some of these factors will now be discussed below.

    Two main operating philosophies for the loading and unloading of containers are the random access system and the use of skeletal trailers. Under the random access system customers deliver/pickup containers directly to/from a train or to/from ground storage. This is the method commonly used in Australian and European intermodal freight terminals. The skeletal trailer system is mainly used in North America and is based on the use of a dedicated fleet of skeletal trailers which are used to pick-up containers directly from trains. [2J Those trailers are then moved to a trailer storage area ready to be picked up by individual customers. The reverse process is followed when loading on to the train. This study uses the random access system operating philosophy.

    The equipment available to handle containers in the intermodal terminal are of three main types: gantry cranes (rail mounted or rubber tyre); side loaders (forklifts and reachstackers) and straddle carriers (rubber tyre). The choice of equipment will depend on container throughput operating strategy physical

    operating space track layout and degree of standardisation in container sizes and types. Each type of equipment has different capital cost land requirements for

    operating purposes and pavement strength requirements.

    Overall transit times reliability of delivery times and costs are the main factors influencing mode choice in the freight transport sector. Users of intermodal terminals have as their main requirements: reliability of delivery times container

    pick-up and delivery cycles which are delay free and the ability to monitor the

    progress of their consignments (i. e. real time information regarding container

    location and estimated arrival times).

    Whichever technology is applied it has to be taken into consideration that

    thecontainer transport system consists of a number of sub-systems the capacities

    of which need to be well harmonised in order to prevent bottle-necks within the

transport chain. It is absolutely essential to meet this demand not only with regard

    to investment in facilities but also with regard to the operational management.

    The ideal situation is for containers to be transferred to the berth before the arrival of the ships to reduce the port time and then to be stowed on the ships

    by the shore cranes. If the import containers are not on the top of the ship then the other containers should be unloaded and restowed. Thus many containers on the

    dock will causes delays.

    Daganzo has analysed the effect of crane operations on ship service at port terminals. Daganzo has also calculated the maximum berth throughput during periods of congestion. He found that the average ship delay can vary considerably with the crane operating strategy Peterkofsky and Daganzo used a crane allocation scheme to minimise the cost that ships incur in port. Taleb-Ibrahimi has analysed the effect of handling and storage strategies for seaport terminals. Noritake and Kimura have analysed the movement of ships in a port and have specified the costs spent at public wharves. In their later study Noritake and Kimura proposed a method to determine the optimum allocation and size of ports in a country from a national economical point of view.

    When a container vessel calls to port the containers on board must be unloaded

    and stored at the port until they are transported further by rail or road. The containers must be stored in a manner so as to minimize the amount of handling needed to place a container in the storage area and to remove it when needed. Therefore, the problem being investigated is the minimization of the total throughput time which is the handling time for all the containers from ships at berth and the transferring time of the containers to the MCT. When dealing with export containers the problem

    would be reversed; that is the minimization of the handling time of the containers from first arrival at the port until the ship carrying the containers departs from the port. When a vessel arrives and its cargo is .unloaded the stevedoring company

    will receive information about where some of the containers are to be transported.

    The containers that are remaining must be placed in storage areas until they are needed. The company does not know when or in what order the containers will be called for loading or unloading. Therefore they must stack the containers in a

    manner so as to minimize the time taken to retrieve a container by considering the storage area constraints. In the case of exports the stevedoring company

    usually knows when a container will depart as it arrives. The stevedoring company charges a fee for containers that are delivered too early in respect to the departure time and after cut-off times no containers are received.

    The Brisbane Multimodal Terminal (BMT) works by removing import containers from the marine container terminals by trucks and then transferring them on to container wagons at the BMT. Export containers arriving by rail are transferred to the marine container terminals by BMT trucks. Empty container wagons are prepared for the next trip and stored at container parks which are adjacent to the Brisbane Multimodal Terminal. Reachstackers and forklifts can handle 20 feet or 40 feet containers at the terminal to load and unload the rail wagons and transport containers between the wagons and the BMT trucks.

    The Brisbane Multimodal Terminal eliminates costly shunting and thus saves

    time and money for importers and exporters in the base of operation. There are currently two container terminals at the Port of Brisbane with a total length of

    1 300m. The terminals are owned by the Port of Brisbane Corporation but are leased to two stevedore companies. One container terminal (Berths 2 and 3) is leased and operated by Australian Stevedores and the other container terminal (Berths 4 and 5) is leased and operated by Conaust Ltd.

    Shore cranes are used to lift the containers on and off container vessels. The containers are unloaded into the marshalling area where they wait until forklifts or highstackers move them to the storage areas or to awaiting trucks for transportation to the Brisbane Multimodal Terminal. Each container terminal has

    storage areas but remote storage areas are also located on Fisherman Islands and at other locations around Brisbanewhich include MurrarieAcacia Ridge

    and Nudgee.

    The trial data set used for the solution and subsequent sensitivity analysis is detailed below. It takes an average of 2. 7 minutes for each crane to unload one container. From the marshalling areaan average of 15% of containers are transferred to the BMT trucks an average of 5 % of containers are transferred to the empty container storage area and the remaining 80 % of containers are transferred to stored in the two storage areas. It takes ten minutes per container to move from the marshalling area to the empty container storage area.

    When using Berth 1 the containers to be stored are moved to Storage Areas 2 and empty storage area. Each of the storage areas is divided into four 1

     and each section has a different traveling time but all sections have sections

    a capacity of 500 containers/stacks. The maximum level of stack is three. The distribution of handling time of highstackers is Erlang. The distribution of

    l. The traveling times are normally dis-handling time of shore crane is norma

    tributed. Mean traveling times from the marshalling area to Section 1 takes 3 minutesto Section 2 takes 3.5 minutesto Section 3 takes 4 minutes and

    r. To move a container from the to Section 4 takes 6 minutes per containe

    r. marshalling area to the BMT trucks takes an average of 3 minutes per containeThe containers moved to the BMT tracks are transported to the BMT and each container takes an average of 6 minutes. Eventually all the containers in

    l. From the storage will be moved to the BMT to be distributed by road or rai

     an average of 73.2 will total of containers that were unloaded from ships

    be distributed by rail and the other 26.87 by road.

    At the present container terminal the number of shore cranes available for

    use is two the number of highstackers (include forklifts) is ten and the number of trucks is six. The problem was solved by using GAMS for different time periods. Sensitivity analysis was performed with the same information but changing the number of shore cranes highstackers and trucks available for use.

    This study has been confined to the basic elements of the overall investment planning problem related to the expansion of the system. Improvements in operational methods are beyond the scope of this study. This model could be further investigated

    by carrying out studies into the effects brought about by improvement in operational methods.

     Investments in multimodal terminals are very costly and the technical progress of the equipment used gives them a much shorter life than they had in the past. In order to obtain maximum benefits it is usually necessary to combine a number of investment strategies into a coherent and complementary package of capital expenditure projects. For example the investment in

    terminal infrastructure to allow faster loading/unloading of ships and trains.

    The problem being investigated is the minimisation of handling and traveling time of containers from the time the ship arrives at port until all the containers from that ship leave the port. If dealing with export containers the problem would be reversed. That is the handling and traveling time of the containers from when they first arrive at the port until the ship carrying the containers departs from the port. This mathematical model can be used as a decision tool in the context of investment appraisals of multimodal container terminals. Long-time data collection should be carried out before the implementation of the model. In the optimisation of the port system through this type of mathematical model several parameters are

    involved in the phenomena which influence the optimisation results. A more detailed study may be undertaken to analyse the effect of these parameters on the improvement of port capacity in the long-term. The model assumes that equipment is available every time it is needed.

    A cost-benefit analysis must be performed before any implementation is considered. To make the cost-benefit analyses results more flexible all analysis should be carried out to determine the sensitivity of the optimal solution to changes in variables. This would provide port planners with a mechanism for the continual updating of the optimal solutions based on any new estimates of these parameters.

    In addition a comprehensive hinterland analysis within the national context will provide more comprehensive data for estimating the future demand on any seaport system. Future studies are needed on the alternative means of increasing seaport efficiency by improving utilization of the present capacity. Such a study might cover better port planning methods investments for increasing the capacity of the lagging segments of the seaport system and means of better utilization of present

    facilities.

1.2 New Words and Expressions

    1. cargo n.(车、船、飞机等运输的)货物

     freight n.货物!船货!运费!货运 v.装货!使充满!运送 2.

     terminal n.终端!终点!极限!终端设备!终点站!总站!航空集散站!3.

    机场候车室!码头

     optimise 优选(确定„„的最佳特 ) !使最优化 4.

     cut down砍倒!胜过!削减!删节 5.

     containerization n.集装箱化! 箱运输 6.

7. stack n.堆!一堆!堆枝!堆积机 v.堆叠

    8. tray n.托盘

    9. piggyback adv.在铁道平车上

     wagon n.铁路货车!一种无篷铁路运货车 10.

     layout n.规划!设计!布局 11.

     delivery n.运送!输送 12.

     random access 随机存取 13.

     skeletal adj.骨髓的!骨干的!轮廓的 14.

     handle v.搬运 15.

     gantry crane 门式起重机 16.

     rubber n.橡皮!橡胶 17.

     tyre n.轮胎 18.

     loader n.装货设备,载入程序,载入者,装货的人 19.

     forklift (also forklift truck) n.叉车!铲车!叉式升降机,堆高机 20.

     reachstacker n.外伸式堆积(码垛) 21.

     straddle carrier 跨车(用于铁路与公路间装卸集装箱) !跨式搬运备 22.

     capital cost资本费用 23.

     standardization (= standardisation) n.校准!标准化!24.

    格化!统一标准

    25. pavement n.铺筑过的地面、道路!铺筑材料

    26. transit n.经过!通行!搬运!运输!运输线vt.横越!通过!经过 27. consignment n. (货物的)交托!寄存物!寄售!托运物!托卖! 28. intermodal adj.联合运输的!综合运输的(使用两种或两种以上运输工具

    完成一次运输的)

    29. harmonise v.使调和

    30. berth n.停泊处!卧铺; v.使停泊

    31. stow vt.装载!堆置!理仓!堆垛

    32. shore crane n.岸边起重机

    33. dock n. (原意是指在低潮时船底拖出的泥沟)船坞!码头 34. throughput n.生产量!生产能力!吞吐量!物料通过量! 容许能力 35. congestion n.交通堵塞!充血

    36. scheme n.安排!配置!计划!方案!摘要 v.计划!设计!图谋!策划 37. container vessel集装箱船

    38. investigate v.调查!研究

    39. minimization n.极小化!求最小值!小型化!化为最小值!最简化 40. stevedore v.() ,装货上船 n. 装卸工人,码头工人,脚夫 41. retrieve v.补救!补偿!弥补(损失等) !恢复!取囚 找回!纠正(错误等) 42. depart v.离开!启程! (火车等)开出

    43. departure n.启程!出发!离开

    44. cut-off n.定点取舍点!分离点!切断!截止!切去

    45. marshal v.整理!编组!引导!整顿!配置!汇集 n.元帅,陆军元帅 46. hinterland n./a.内地(),穷乡僻壤(),凡靠港口供应的内地贸易区!

    物资供应地区! 腹地!内地

    47. constraint n.约束!强制!局促

48. parameter n.参数!参量

    49. variable n.变量!变数(抽样)

    50. coherent adj.粘在一起的!一致的!连贯的 51. complementary adj.互补的!互相补足的 52. expenditure n. (时间、金钱、劳力等的)支出!花费! 消费!消耗

    53. mathematical adj.数学的!数学上的 54. appraisal n.评价!估价(尤指对财产估价以便征税) 55. utilization n.利用

Report this document

For any questions or suggestions please email
cust-service@docsford.com