Financing Real Estate in India

By Ida Lee,2014-11-21 17:45
17 views 0
Financing Real Estate in India

Financing Real Estate in India

    Merrill Lynch has forecasted that the Indian realty sector will grow to a $90 billion industry in the next eight years

    It’s a huge figure we are looking at US$ 90 billion. That’s what Merrill Lynch forecasts that the Indian

    realty sector will grow to by 2015. As industry is enthusiastic about that figure, RBI has raised its voice of concern. It reasons that the portfolio inflows should confirm to the norms applicable to foreign direct investment (FDI) in the sector. Analysts feel that the central bank should revisit the FDI norms rather than curbing the portfolio inflows.

    As they say, no matter how thin you slice, there are always two sides. A growing economy comes with its own burdens creating demands on infrastructure and real estate. The relevance of real estate further enhances when we look at the following statistics:

    1. It is the second largest employer in India (including construction and facilities management)

    2. It is linked to about 250 ancillary industries like cement, brick, steel through backward &

    forward linkages

    3. A unit increase in expenditure in this sector has a multiplier effect and the capacity to

    generate income as high as five times

    Thus, to support growth, various concessions and benefits have been given to the sector. This would help change the current contribution of housing and real estate to India’s GDP which is at 1% against 3-

    6% for developing countries.

    Funding can be sourced using debt, equity or a mix of both. Debt funding could be done from sources like banks, Non Banking Financial Corporations (NBFC) or via External Commercial Borrowings (ECB). Equity participation would involve investments in the firm at an entity level or project level. FDI is one of the ways of financing a firm’s projects. FDI in real estate is permitted in construction and project

    development related to both residential and commercial development in housing townships and commercial office space subject to certain project conditions. With yields at around 11.0% for office space, which go upto 20-25% in greenfield projects, investing in India is certainly a good option. A November 2006 ASSOCHAM study estimates share of real estate in FDI to rise to 26% by the close of 2007 from around 16% last year. Table 1 shows the levels of investments that have taken place in the first quarter of 2007.

Investor Entity Location Investment Stake Investment

    Type and (%) Amount (USD

    Sector million)

    Evolvence India Emaar-MGF Delhi Entity level n/a 41

    Evolvence India CCCL (Consolidated Chennai Entity level n/a 12


    Consortium Ltd)

    IL&FS Ansals Properties & Delhi SPV 49 29

    Infrastructures (APIL)

    HDFC Realty Fund Ansals Properties & Delhi SPV, 33 n/a

    Infrastructures (APIL) commercial IT


    Nakheel Group Parsvnath Pan India Entity level, 50 550

    residential and


    Nakheel Group DLF Gurgaon, Entity level, 50 10,000

    Mumbai and residential


    Morgan Stanley Oberoi Constructions Mumbai Entity level, 10.75 152

    Special Situations mixed use

    Real Estate Fund

    Samsara Capita IDEB Projects Bangalore Entity level n/a 33

TPG-Axon Capital DivyaSree Bangalore Entity level n/a 100


    Vornado Realty Gurgaon SEZ Delhi SPV, industrial 50 n/a

    Starwoods Hotels & Brigade Hotels Bangalore SPV, hotels n/a n/a


    Citigroup Venture Indu Projects Hyderabad Entity level 9 33

    Capital International

    Maurtius Ltd

    Goldman Sachs Unitech Delhi, Mumbai SPV, mixed use 33 66

    and Bangalore

Name Date Capital(USD million)

    Trinity Capital April 2006 500

    Eredene Capital May 2006 115

    India Hospitality Corp August 2006 100

    Ishaan Real Estate Plc (K.Raheja) November 2006 405

    Unitech Corporate Parks Plc December 2006 750

    Hirco Plc (Hiranandani December 2006 750

    Source: Jones Lang LaSalle Research, 1Q07

    SPV: special purpose vehicle

    As listing in local markets (BSE/NSE) gets difficult many investors are trying to look west. The Alternate Investment Market (AIM) with its easier norms has been one of the easiest foreign shores where various players have raised money (Table 2). These funds will be used in FDI (foreign direct investment)-

    compliant mega property projects ranging from residential townships to commercial establishments across the country.

    Table 2: Firms listed in AIMNameDateCapital(USD million)Trinity CapitalApril 2006500Eredene

    CapitalMay 2006115India Hospitality CorpAugust 2006100Ishaan Real Estate Plc (K.Raheja)November 2006405Unitech Corporate Parks PlcDecember 2006750Hirco Plc (HiranandaniDecember 2006750

    Source: AIM

    Lately, there have been many flags raised and questions asked in this context. As investments

    increased so did the prices and the obvious fear of a real estate bubble. With no clear methodologies and norms on valuations, there was the imperative fear of the bulls chasing away the bears and shattering many dreams. There were doubts raised on what to define as an FII investment vis-a-vis FDI.

    Some of the issues, which have been raised or resolved, are

    1. On issues of pre-IPO placement, the finance ministry has concluded that if FIIs wish to invest in

    a pre-IPO placement of realty companies, the investment would be classified as foreign direct

    investment, or FDI, which is subject to a longer lock-in period, thus trying to eliminate the

    speculation in such investments.

    2. On valuations, the SEBI issued directives that valuations of real estate companies to be based

    on their development plans and not on their land banks. There is also a proposal for valuers to

    be registered with the SEBI.

    With the advent of Real Estate Mutual Funds (REMFs), corporate governance issues, stricter

    compliance by players, maturing markets and greater transparency this market offers great potential for its players be it the developers, funds, FIIs or retail investors. Also the new locations in mind of

investors would be the Tier III cities which offer fewer entry barriers in the form of competitive land

prices and availability of land banks.

Report this document

For any questions or suggestions please email