DOCX

application for qualification of writing dissertation paper(final)

By Debra Marshall,2014-10-18 20:16
10 views 0
application for qualification of writing dissertation paper(final)

    Application for Qualification of Writing Dissertation Paper

     10/18/2010

     Month/date/year Student ID Z09D125F

    Major Major of Cooperativeness in Legal,Economics and

    Social Affairs

    Name seal or signature

    Name of your 下井康史;SHIMOI Yasushi~

    supervisor

    Names of your 兵藤守男HYODO Morio

    sub-supervisors 馬場健BABA Takeshi

    Title of your A Comparative Study of Civil Servant Evaluation dissertation System in Japan(EU and China

    paper

    Plan for Attached sheet

    dissemination

    Planned date of June 2011

    submission

    Graduate School of Modern Society and Culture, Niigata University

    1

    Research plan

    This plan must be typewritten in English

Annex

    Plan for dissertation paper I. Current research:

    A4 sized, within 400 words

    II. Research plan until writing a dissertation paper

    A4 sized, within 400 words

    III. Summary of your dissertation paper

    IV. Main contents of your dissertation paper

    Please mention the characteristic, brand-new points of your

    research, relation of current research

    A4 sized, within 750 words

    2

I. Current research:

    A4 sized, within 400 words

    To speak frankly, as far as the issue of civil servant evaluation system is concerned, I did not have academic research experience. However, after graduating from graduate school of law in Anhui University where I was instructed in concepts of democracy and the rule of law, I became a civil servant at Hefei Municipal Personnel Bureau. From the aspect of personnel administration(Hefei Municipal Personnel Bureau plays a important part in

    public administration to secure fare personnel administration of Hefei City and to protect the benefits of civil servants. During this period, I have known that it was very important to build a fair and scientific evaluation system for civil servant. A good evaluation system can increase the motivation of civil servants, that ideally leads to greater satisfaction in their professional lives and that at the same time to improve their performance within the public organizations employing them. Since then, I have begun to collect data relating to civil servant evaluation system and tried to write some reports on how to strengthen further the development of qualified personnel administration for stable economic growth of the country. Through the job of collecting data and writing reports(I got a practical experience on social research method. At present, under the title of A Comparative Study of Civil Servant Evaluation System in Japan(EU and China,

    I intend to study the civil servant evaluation system precisely. I do hope that my practical job experiences in Personnel Bureau and research experience will help to finish the present job a lot.

    3

? Research plan until writing a dissertation paper

    A4 sized, within 400 words

    Evaluation and human resources management are one of the primary issues in the modernization of public administration in China: this can be seen clearly from the many reforms set out in recent years. As is well-known, civil servant evaluation is a worldwide difficult problem. Though many efforts have been made to pursue a fair, just and objective evaluation of civil servant, there is no common scientific method so far. Over the last decade, China's civil servant evaluation system has been continuously improved, but there are still many problems, such as: the standard of the evaluation regulation is too general; the regulation failed to work out the scientific evaluation and the clear aim; the evaluation regulation lacks evident measures of stimulation, etc. To better the evaluation regulation, it is important to place more emphases on exchanging with and learning from overseas. The study will focuses on a comparative examination of civil servant evaluation system in Japan, EU and try to get some lessons for China.

To finish the research work mentioned above, the time schedule will be the following

    October(2010 collecting basic data on civil servant evaluation system of Japan and EU November, 2010: literature review about civil servant evaluation system in China and

    write chapter1

    January( 2011starting to write chapter2

    February(2011literature review about current situation of Japan and regulations

    starting to write chapter3

    March(2011 literature review about current situation of EU and regulations starting

    to write chapter4

    April(2011 starting to write chapter5

    May(2011 starting to write conclusion and recommendation

     Review and correct the draft

    June(2011 submit the final version of the thesis

    4

?. Summary of your dissertation paper

    The preliminary outline of my dissertation paper is as follow:

    1. Introduction

     1.1 Rationale

     1.2 Civil servant evaluation system and civil service reform

    1.3 Overview of the paper

    1.3.1. Research Question

    1.3.2. The goal of the paper

    1.3.3. Literature review and research methods

    1.3.4. Scope of the paper

    2. Historical background and the current situation of civil servant evaluation system in

    China

    2.1 Historical background

    2.2 Current situation

    2.2.1 Civil servant constitution and evaluation regulations

    2.2.2 Evaluation practice in China

    2.2.3 Principles and orientation of civil servant evaluation system

    2.2.4 Content and criteria of civil servant evaluation system

    2.2.5 Running mechanism of civil servant evaluation system

     2.2.5.1 Evaluation subject

     2.2.5.2 Evaluation procedures

    2.2.5.3 Evaluation methods

    2.2.5.4 Evaluation effects

    2.3 Main problems and questions

    2.4 New development

    3. System used for civil servant evaluation in Japan

    3.1 Historical background

    3.2 Current situation

    3.3 New trends and development

    5

4. System used for civil servant evaluation in EU

    4.1 Historical background

    4.2 Current situation

    4.3 New trends and development

    5. Similarities and differences in civil servant evaluation system in China, Japan and EU 5.1 Principles and orientation of civil servant evaluation system

    5.2 Content and criteria of civil servant evaluation system

    5.3 Running mechanism of civil servant evaluation system

    6. Conclusion and enlightenment to the construction of Chinese civil servant evaluation system

    6.1 Major findings

    6.2 Lessons from Japan and EU

    6.3 Suggestions and recommendations

    6

?.Main contents of your dissertation paper

    Please mention the characteristic, brand-new points of your research, relation of current research

    A4 sized, within 750 words

    Because of increasing connections, cooperation and coordination between national, regional and local administrations, comparative studies of public administration, especially civil service system studies, assuming more and more importance. A lot of studies and reports have been published by different organizations and institutions. However, on the whole, comparisons of civil servant evaluation system in different countries is not so many, especially in the countries where the so-called career system

    are used. In light of the increasingly complicated administrative challenges we face, and in order to realize an efficient, high-quality administrative management, it is important for administrative executives, as servants of the whole community, to have expertise and wider vision, as well as bold ambitions and a sense of ethics. For this purpose, a good evaluation system is important to assess, retain and develop human resource. The research will focus on a comparative examination of the civil servant evaluation system in Japan, EU and China and will first of all look at the differences and common feathers, analysis the merit and demerit of systems used in different countries, and try to give some recommendations and suggestions to the reform of Chinese civil service system.

    The dissertation is composed of six chapters and can be divided into three parts. The first part is the first chapter. At first, I will give some introduction to the reasons and principles on which the civil servant evaluation system is based. I point out the most important function of evaluation is to increase civil servants motivation. Evaluation can not be separated from career development. Evaluation is good opportunity to look at the past(results achieved, past performance, etc. ) and to look to the future(new objective, training needs, promotion, etc.) Then, I make a general introduction to Chinese civil

    7

    servant system reform and civil servant evaluation system, and try to point out the problems and questions of the current system. In this part, I also want to do some literature review concerning civil servant evaluation in China. At last, I will discuss the research methodology and scope in this study.

    The second part is the main body composed of the second, the third, the fourth and the fifth chapter. It has made a comprehensive comparative study on Chinese, Japanese and EU civil servant evaluation constitution. The second, the third and the fourth chapter will introduce the civil servant evaluation system in China, Japan and EU respectively. The fifth chapter is the most significant one. At first, it deals with the comparison of the principles and value orientation between Chinese, Japanese and EU civil servant evaluation and comes to a conclusion that the difference of ideas and instructions is the inner reason for the difference between civil servant assessment constitution. Then, I make a comparison of the content and the system of standard between

    Chinese, Japanese and EU civil servant evaluation constitution. By comparing virtue, competence, diligence, performance, cleanness in Chinese civil servant evaluation constitution with performance, capability, personality and adaptability in Japanese civil servant assessment constitution, the problems in the setting of target system and result of Chinese civil servant assessment constitution are revealed. At last, the running mechanisms of civil servant assessment are analyzed and compared concretely in assessment subject, assessment procedure, assessment methods and assessment effect. I point out that constructions of legal system, constitution and specialization should be strengthened in Chinese civil servant evaluation subject and that attention should be paid on regulating and intensifying routine evaluation in evaluation procedure and at the same time reveal the disadvantages of Japanese civil evaluation subject's lacking training and evaluation procedure not being public; I conclude the differences between the two countries' evaluation methods and show the superiority of combining evaluation effect with training and salary in Japanese civil servant evaluation. The third part is the conclusion. By comparing status and development tendency of Chinese civil servant evaluation constitution with those of Japan and EU, I expound the existing problems and the tendency and the keys of reformation in the future. As for the enlightenment to

    8

    the construction of Chinese civil servant evaluation constitution, I try to provide consultative suggestions and applicable plans for the modeling and running mode of Chinese civil servant assessment constitution from culture construction, constitution and operation that are key points of improving civil evaluation constitution.

    9

Report this document

For any questions or suggestions please email
cust-service@docsford.com