DOC

Head of Schools RecommendationASSESSMENT FOR CONTINUING

By Rodney Walker,2014-10-29 17:32
7 views 0
Head of Schools RecommendationASSESSMENT FOR CONTINUING

    Head of School’s Recommendation: ASSESSMENT FOR CONTINUING APPOINTMENT/ PROMOTION/MID-TERM REVIEW/GENERAL

    PERFORMANCE

    Record the purpose of this review: Continuing Appointment (Final Review) (Please place an “X” in the appropriate box) Promotion

     Mid-Term Review

     General Performance

Staff Member’s Name School/Institute/Centre

This form has two purposes:

    1. The Head of School should use it to record his/her recommendation where the staff member is undertaking mid-term review or intending to apply for continuing appointment or promotion. Comments should cover performance at the University, and in the case of continuing appointment or promotion, they should be based on achievement discussed at the performance appraisals conducted in the intervening period.

    2. The Head of School may use it to record his/her assessment of the staff member‟s achievements in the review period, summarised under the headings listed, in order to commend the staff member‟s achievements or to clarify any areas where an improvement in performance

    is required. This should be done annually for staff on probationary appointments.

    Where the Head of School has not been the „supervisor‟ at the Annual Review, he/she must sign this document after consultation with the

    supervisor. If the Head of School does not accept the supervisor‟s recommendation, he/she must discuss this with the staff member.

    Teaching and Postgraduate Supervision

    Research, Scholarship and Original Achievement

Service (internal and external)

Staff Development Plan

    Completion of the Personal and Professional Development Plan is an integral part of the annual review process.

    Has a Staff Development Plan been mutually agreed? Yes No For a Mid-Term Review candidate, list any difficulties and how these are being addressed:

Funding for Promotion of a Research Academic (complete for Research Academic)

    Initials: I have reviewed the candidate’s funding contract and found:

    The funding contract permits the promotion of the Research Academic. Yes No The „Yes‟ box must be ticked for the promotion to be considered.

    The contract allows the funds to be used to support any increase in salary Yes No arising from the promotion.

    If no, where will the funding for the promotion come from?

    Recommended classification title (eg Senior Research Fellow UQ)

Supervisor’s Summary

    To be completed by the supervisor where the Head does not conduct the annual review. Include names of senior

    staff consulted where recommendations are made.

Head of School’s Recommendation: Assessment for Continuing Appointment/Promotion/Mid-Term Review/General Performance (2004) 1 Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.uq.edu.au/current-staff/index.html?page=10606

Head of School’s Summary

    Head of School to complete in all cases. Include names of senior staff consulted where recommendations are made.

    Recommendation (where appropriate)

     Continuing Appointment Promotion

     Recommended Strongly recommended

     Marginal Recommended

     Not Recommended Marginal

     Not Recommended

    Supervisor’s Name (where Head of Signature Date School does not conduct annual review)

    Head’s Name (Head of School/Director Signature Date of (Faculty) Centre/Director of Institute)

    Staff Member’s Signature Date

Head of School’s Recommendation: Assessment for Continuing Appointment/Promotion/Mid-Term Review/General Performance (2004) 2 Available on the World Wide Web: http://www.uq.edu.au/current-staff/index.html?page=10606

Report this document

For any questions or suggestions please email
cust-service@docsford.com